Table 3

Comparison of performance metrics between proposed and benchmark methods on the NC4K dataset. Only models with less than 50G Multiply-Accumulate Operations (MACs) were considered for computational efficiency. The top-performing method for each metric on each dataset is highlighted in bold, while the second-best method is underscored.

ModelPub/YearInputsaFβwMEϕmnPara.MACs
SINet [10]CVPR’2035220.8080.7230.0580.87148.95M19.42G
C2FNet [32]IJCAF2135220.8380.7620.0490.89728.41M13.12G
TINet [48]AAAF2135220.8290.7340.0550.87928.56M8.58G
JSCOD [21]CVPR’2135220.8420.7710.0470.898121.63M25.20G
LSR [24]CVPR’2135220.8400.7660.0480.89557.90M25.21G
PFNet [28]CVPR’2141620.8290.7450.0530.88745.64M26.54G
C2FNet-V2 [1]TCSVT’2235220.8400.7700.0480.89644.94M18.10G
ERRNet [16]PR’2235220.8270.7370.0540.88769.76M20.05G
TPRNet [44]TVC J’2235220.8460.7680.0480.89832.95M12.98G
FAPNet [46]TIP’2235220.8510.7750.0470.89929.52M29.69G
BSANet [47]AAAI’2238420.8410.7710.0480.89732.58M29.70G
SegMaR. [17]CVPR’2235220.8410.7810.0460.89656.21M33.63G
SINetV2 [8]TPAMI’2235220.8470.7700.0480.90326.98M12.28G
DGNet-S [15]MIR’2335220.8450.7640.0470.9027.02M1.20G
DGNet [15]MIR’2335220.8570.7840.0420.91119.22M2.77G
GreenCGD-D3-1000-67220.8150.7560.0490.88416.83M13.70G
GreenCOD-D3-10000-67220.8230.7660.0470.89217.62M15.06G
GreenCGD-D6-1000-67220.8200.7630.0470.89117.50M13.78G
GreenCOD-D6-10000-67220.8270.7720.0460.89324.34M16.22G

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options