Table 4

Comparison of performance metrics between proposed and benchmark methods on the COD10K dataset. Only models with more than 50G Multiply-Accumulate Operations (MACs) were considered. The top-performing method for each metric on each dataset is highlighted in bold, while the second-best method is underscored.

ModelPub/YearInputsαFβwMEϕmnPara.MACs
R-MGL [39]CVPR’2147320.8330.7400.0520.86767.64M249.89G
S-MGL [39]CVPR’2147320.8290.7310.0550.86363.60M236.60G
UGTR [36]ICCV’2147320.8390.7470.0520.87448.87M127.12G
BAS [30]arXiv’2128820.8170.7320.0580.85987.06M161.19G
NCHIT [40]CVIU’2228820.8300.7100.0580.851--
OCENet [23]WACV’2248020.8530.7850.0450.90260.31M59.70G
BGNet [33]IJCAI’2241620.8510.7880.0440.90779.85M58.45G
PreyNet [43]MM’2244820.8340.7630.0500.88738.53M58.10G
ZoomNet [29]CVPR’2238420.8530.7840.0430.89632.38M95.50G
FDNet [45]CVPR’2241620.8340.7500.0520.893--
CamoFormer-C [38]arXiv’2338420.8830.8340.0320.93396.69M50.77G
CamoFormer-R [38]arXiv’2338420.8550.7880.0420.90054.25M78.85G
PopNet [35]arXiv’2351220.8610.8020.0420.909188.05M154.88G
GreenCOD-D3-1000-67220.8150.7560.0490.88416.83M13.70G
GreenCOD-D3-10000-67220.8230.7660.0470.89217.62M15.06G
GreenCOD-D6-1000-67220.8200.7630.0470.89117.50M13.78G
GreenCOD-D6-10000-67220.8270.7720.0460.89324.34M16.22G

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal