Summary of findings for sub-research questions 1 & 2
| Sub-research Question and main finding | Relevant interactions | Description of researcher interaction |
|---|---|---|
| Addressing RQ1: Researcher strategies that initiated or sustained productive talk about case pupils' spatial reasoning | ||
| Strategic reassurance, sharing expertise with classroom examples, and offering practical solutions | 1–3, 5 | Acknowledged teacher concerns; provided concrete examples to reframe challenges as learning opportunities |
| Promotion of growth mindset and reassessment of pupils' potential | 2, 3 | Highlighted children's creative abilities; challenged teacher assumptions through classroom examples |
| Dialogic questioning to support reflective practice and prompting comparison | 5–7 | Used strategic questions to prompt analysis of language use, lesson framing, and gesture in practice |
| Facilitation via summarizing, focusing, challenging assumptions, and connecting to pedagogy | 2, 6 | Fostered open, co-constructive exchanges for joint reflection and deeper inquiry into pupil thinking |
| Addressing RQ2: Researcher facilitation supporting or hindering teacher learning across professional development dimensions | ||
| Increased teacher satisfaction and building trust | 1, 4 | Positive pupil engagement and creative responses fostered trust and satisfaction between researcher and teachers |
| Knowledge enhancement through multimodal pedagogical strategies | 2, 7 | Confirmation and elaboration on teacher's intuitive practices (gesture, visual scaffolding) and introducing sketching before design |
| Shifts in teaching practice and flexible lesson planning | 1, 5–7 | Teachers adapted plans after workshops, incorporating more intentional spatial reasoning strategies after classroom observation |
| Sub-research Question and main finding | Relevant interactions | Description of researcher interaction |
|---|---|---|
| Strategic reassurance, sharing expertise with classroom examples, and offering practical solutions | 1–3, 5 | Acknowledged teacher concerns; provided concrete examples to reframe challenges as learning opportunities |
| Promotion of growth mindset and reassessment of pupils' potential | 2, 3 | Highlighted children's creative abilities; challenged teacher assumptions through classroom examples |
| Dialogic questioning to support reflective practice and prompting comparison | 5–7 | Used strategic questions to prompt analysis of language use, lesson framing, and gesture in practice |
| Facilitation via summarizing, focusing, challenging assumptions, and connecting to pedagogy | 2, 6 | Fostered open, co-constructive exchanges for joint reflection and deeper inquiry into pupil thinking |
| Increased teacher satisfaction and building trust | 1, 4 | Positive pupil engagement and creative responses fostered trust and satisfaction between researcher and teachers |
| Knowledge enhancement through multimodal pedagogical strategies | 2, 7 | Confirmation and elaboration on teacher's intuitive practices (gesture, visual scaffolding) and introducing sketching before design |
| Shifts in teaching practice and flexible lesson planning | 1, 5–7 | Teachers adapted plans after workshops, incorporating more intentional spatial reasoning strategies after classroom observation |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.