Table 8

Regression results of the models with the Brand value/TA ratio as dependent

Brand Value/TA
1234
Bank size0.193−0.0241−0.09170.312
 (0.62)(−0.11)(−0.22)(1.01)
RWA/TA0.0597−0.0626−0.06600.0459
 (0.54)(−0.91)(−0.48)(0.44)
ESG score1.109   
 (1.23)   
Environmental score −0.487  
  (−0.94)  
Social score  −0.443 
   (−0.33) 
Governance score   1.710*
    (2.48)
Bank size × RWA/TA−0.003210.002470.00292−0.00252
 (−0.59)(0.70)(0.42)(−0.49)
Bank size × ESG score−0.0573   
 (−1.30)   
RWA/TA × Esg score−0.0329†   
 (−1.75)   
Bank size × RWA/TA × ESG score0.00169*, a   
 (1.84)   
Bank size × Environmental score 0.0179  
  (0.70)  
RWA/TA × Environmental score 0.00606  
  (0.56)  
Bank size × RWA/TA × Environmental score −0.000153  
  (−0.28)  
Bank size × Social score  0.0184 
   (0.28) 
RWA/TA × Social score  −0.00442 
   (−0.17) 
Bank size × RWA/TA × Social score  0.000293 
   (0.23) 
Bank size × Governance score   −0.0862*
    (−2.58)
RWA/TA × Governance score   −0.0309*
    (−2.10)
Bank size × RWA/TA × Governance score   0.00159*a
    (2.26)
Constant−3.8850.8171.937−6.129
 (−0.60)(0.18)(0.23)(−0.95)
Controlsyesyesyesyes
Bank FEyesyesyesyes
Year FEyesyesyesyes
N797797797797
F17.62***16.83***17.25***19.68***
R20.2710.3010.2590.274
a

One tailed p-value

***, * and † denote significance at 0.1%, 5% and 10%, respectively, with t-statistics in parentheses

Source(s): Authors' own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal