Table 10.

Alternative explanations II: Ownership-related characteristics

Dependent variableCash
SampleFullw/o widely held firms
SpecificationCoeff.(1)(2)(3)
LMR λ1–0.001 (−0.58)–0.006* (−1.93)–0.005 (−1.63)
LMR#FFF λ20.005** (2.19)0.011*** (4.28)0.010*** (4.23)
FFF–0.020*** (−3.25)–0.042** (−2.26)–0.063 (−0.24)
LMR# other ultimate owner λ3–0.005*** (−3.29)
Other ultimate owner0.020*** (2.98)
DiffH0: λ1=λ1+λ2 p<0.028
DiffH0: λ2=λ3 p<0.000
DiffH0: λ1+λ2=λ1+λ3 p<0.000
Size(t1)#FFF0.007 (1.64)
Growth(t1)#FFF–0.004 (−0.93)
Leverage(t1)#FFF–0.016 (−0.77)
NWC(t1)#FFF–0.001 (−0.03)
Investments(t1)#FFF–0.022 (−1.05)
Dividend dummy(t1)#FFF–0.003 (−0.75)
Cash flow(t1)#FFF0.014 (0.71)
Cash flow volatility(t1)#FFF0.046* (1.97)
Inflation(t1)#FFF–0.103 (−0.81)
GDP growth(t1)#FFF0.017 (0.39)
ln(GDP p.c.)(t1)#FFF–0.004 (−0.17)
ControlsYesYesYes
Firm fixed effectsYesYesYes
Industry-Year fixed effectsYesYesYes
Country specific year trendYesYesYes
Clustered standard errorsCountry-levelCountry-levelCountry-level
Observations28,11315,18515,185
 Radj20.0580.0650.067
Note(s):

This table presents the results of OLS regressions accounting for alternative ownership-related characteristics, explaining the main findings. Column 1 presents the results of OLS regression of FFF-related and other ultimate owner-related differential effect of LMR on cash holdings using widely held firms as reference group. Columns 2 and 3 show the FFF-related differential effect using other ultimate owner as reference group. The table also reports results of Wald-test for coefficients from Column 1. In all regression specifications, Cash is used as dependent variable. All variables are defined in Table A1 in the  Appendix. All independent variables except LMR and all ownership-related variables are lagged by one period. All regression specifications include firm fixed effects, industry-year fixed effects, and country specific year trends. The t-Statistics in parentheses are based on robust standard errors, clustered at the country level. *, **, *** denote statistical significance at the 10, 5, and 1% levels, respectively

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options