Table 1

Overview of empirical studies on affordances and leadership in a remote work setting

ArticleTechnologyAffordancesLeadership implicationsContext
Arvedsen and Hassert (2020) PowerPoint, Kanban boardAffordances of talk and ICT objectsLeadership is collaboratively achieved in mundane meeting discussions by mobilizing several multimodal resourcesCompanies in the IT, engineering, oil and gas, consulting, and food and beverage industries
Brotheridge et al. (2015) Computer-mediated communication (e.g. email, instant messaging, other digital media)Communication media's affordancesAffordances of computer-mediated communication influence status differences between leaders and followersRescue and peacekeeping agency
Gilstrap (2019) Mobile technologiesMobile affordances for leadersMobile technologies afford team leaders' combination of physical and non-physical presence, managing multiple time-based interactions, and improving their ability to act or lead while on the moveFirst-, second-, and third-sector organizations
Malhotra and Majchrzak (2012) Virtual workspace toolsAffordances of virtual workspacesVirtual workplace affordances enhance situational awareness. Affordances influence satisfaction with knowledge coordination in virtual teamsCompanies from service and manufacturing industries
Matikainen et al. (2023) UnspecifiedKnowledge-related affordancesLeaders identify knowledge-related challenges and opportunities during remote work. They manage tensions concerning knowledge codification, silos, and creationHigher education institutions
Willermark and Islind (2023) UnspecifiedVirtual school affordancesVirtual school affordances enable school leaders to focus on core activities, implement distributed leadership and one-on-one interaction with staff, and provide more structure and clarity in decision-making and outreach activitiesSchools
Source(s): Authors' own creation

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options