Tables and bar charts show A H P pairwise comparisons and weights for four different criteria.The multiple sections combine pairwise comparison matrices and corresponding horizontal bar charts for evaluating criteria using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (A H P). At the top, a table presents a pairwise comparison matrix for five financial capacity criteria labeled “C 21”, “C 22”, “C 23”, “C 24”, and “C 25”. Both the rows and columns are labeled with these criteria. The data from the rows are as follows: Row “C 21”: C 21: 1.000, 1.000, 1.000; C 22: 1.064, 1.095, 2.127; C 23: 1.822, 1.997, 3.344; C 24: 0.933, 1.266, 1.740; C 25: 1.242, 1.582, 1.946 Row “C 22”: C 21: 0.470, 0.913, 0.940; C 22: 1.000, 1.000, 1.000; C 23: 1.257, 1.387, 2.623; C 24: 0.648, 0.822, 1.129; C 25: 1.629, 2.122, 3.070 Row “C 23”: C 21: 0.299, 0.501, 0.549; C 22: 0.381, 0.721, 0.795; C 23: 1.000, 1.000, 1.000; C 24: 1.301, 1.721, 2.576; C 25: 0.704, 0.702, 1.271 Row “C 24”: C 21: 0.575, 0.790, 1.072; C 22: 0.885, 1.216, 1.544; C 23: 0.388, 0.581, 0.769; C 24: 1.000, 1.000, 1.000; C 25: 1.082, 1.271, 1.623 Row “C 25”: C 21: 1.946, 0.632, 0.514; C 22: 0.326, 0.471, 0.614; C 23: 0.787, 1.424, 1.420; C 24: 0.616, 0.787, 0.924; C 25: 1.000, 1.000, 1.000. Below the matrix, a note states, “Y prime max equals 5.22, C I equals 0.057 and C R equals 0.045”. Beneath this, a chart titled “Financial capacity” displays horizontal bars representing weights of five criteria. The horizontal axis ranges from 0.000 to 0.300 with an interval of 0.050. The categories and their values are “Financial Performance (C 21)” at 0.279, “Guarantee Bond (C 22)” at 0.230, “Company Turnover (C 23)” at 0.162, “Credit Rating Liquidity (C 24)” at 0.179, and “Valid tax Clearance certificate (C 25)” at 0.150. Below, another table presents a pairwise comparison matrix for six technical capacity criteria labeled “C 31”, “C 32”, “C 33”, “C 34”, “C 35”, and “C 36”. The columns are labeled with these criteria. The data from the rows are as follows: Row 1: C 31: 1.000, 1.000, 1.000; C 32: 1.107, 1.501, 2.282; C 33: 1.431, 1.895, 2.687; C 34: 1.022, 1.423, 1.869; C 35: 2.183, 3.224, 3.015; C 36: 1.166, 1.220, 2.030 Row 2: C 31: 0.438, 0.666, 0.904; C 32: 1.000, 1.000, 1.000; C 33: 1.972, 2.620, 3.481; C 34: 1.499, 1.922, 2.456; C 35: 1.652, 2.128, 3.227; C 36: 1.351, 1.503, 2.607 Row 3: C 31: 0.372, 0.528, 0.699; C 32: 0.287, 0.382, 0.507; C 33: 1.000, 1.000, 1.000; C 34: 1.733, 2.317, 3.298; C 35: 1.089, 1.415, 2.034; C 36: 1.425, 1.904, 2.702 Row 4: C 31: 0.535, 0.703, 0.978; C 32: 0.407, 0.520, 0.667; C 33: 0.303, 0.432, 0.577; C 34: 1.000, 1.000, 1.000; C 35: 0.598, 0.807, 1.098; C 36: 1.874, 2.476, 3.174 Row 5: C 31: 3.015, 0.310, 0.332; C 32: 0.310, 0.470, 0.605; C 33: 0.492, 0.707, 0.918; C 34: 0.911, 1.240, 1.672; C 35: 1.000, 1.000, 1.000; C 36: 1.692, 2.461, 3.271 Row 6: C 31: 0.492, 0.820, 0.858; C 32: 0.384, 0.665, 0.740; C 33: 0.370, 0.525, 0.702; C 34: 0.315, 0.404, 0.534; C 35: 0.306, 0.406, 0.591; C 36: 1.000, 1.000, 1.000 Below the matrix, a note states, “Y prime max equals 6.50, C I equals 0.1 and C R equals 0.081”. Beneath this, a chart titled “Technical capacity” presents horizontal bars for six criteria with values along a scale from 0.000 to 0.300 with an interval of 0.050. The categories and values are “Previous Work Quality (C 31)” at 0.247, “Performance in Similar Project (C 32)” at 0.238, “Labor, Plant and Equipment (C 33)” at 0.163, “Litigation and claim history (C 34)” at 0.127, “Work Plan and Scheduling (C 35)” at 0.136, and “Experience of Staff (C 36)” at 0.089. Following them, a table presents a pairwise comparison matrix for six experience-related criteria labeled “C 41”, “C 42”, “C 43”, “C 44”, “C 45”, and “C 46”. Both the rows and columns are labeled with these criteria. The data from the rows are as follows: Row “C 41”: C 41: 1.000, 1.000, 1.000; C 42: 0.863, 0.885, 1.615; C 43: 1.020, 1.270, 1.632; C 44: 1.354, 1.824, 2.228; C 45: 2.036, 2.465, 2.985; C 46: 0.703, 0.806, 1.172 Row “C 42”: C 41: 0.619, 1.130, 1.159; C 42: 1.000, 1.000, 1.000; C 43: 1.000, 1.000, 1.351; C 44: 1.216, 1.691, 1.619; C 45: 1.733, 2.371, 3.245; C 46: 1.270, 1.739, 2.398 Row “C 43”: C 41: 0.613, 0.787, 0.980; C 42: 0.740, 1.000, 1.000; C 43: 1.000, 1.000, 1.000; C 44: 2.021, 2.594, 3.510; C 45: 0.873, 1.257, 1.745; C 46: 1.173, 1.468, 2.065 Row “C 44”: C 41: 0.449, 0.548, 0.739; C 42: 0.617, 0.591, 0.823; C 43: 0.285, 0.385, 0.495; C 44: 1.000, 1.000, 1.000; C 45: 0.696, 0.838, 0.939; C 46: 1.115, 1.655, 1.917 Row “C 45”: C 41: 2.985, 0.406, 0.335; C 42: 0.308, 0.422, 0.577; C 43: 0.573, 0.796, 1.145; C 44: 1.066, 1.194, 1.437; C 45: 1.000, 1.000, 1.000; C 46: 0.961, 1.368, 1.825 Row “C 46”: C 41: 0.854, 1.240, 1.422; C 42: 0.417, 0.575, 0.787; C 43: 0.484, 0.681, 0.852; C 44: 0.522, 0.604, 0.897; C 45: 0.548, 0.731, 1.041; C 46: 1.000, 1.000, 1.000. Below the matrix, a note states, “Y prime max equals 6.26, C I equals 0.05 and C R equals 0.042”. Beneath this, another chart titled “Experience” displays horizontal bars for six criteria on a scale from 0.000 to 0.250 with an interval of 0.050. The categories and values are “History of Non-Performance of Contract (C 41)” at 0.210, “Projects Completed on Time (C 42)” at 0.217, “Similar Work Experiences (C 43)” at 0.197, “General Experience (C 44)” at 0.119, “Experience in the Region (C 45)” at 0.133, and “Availability of Required License (C 46)” at 0.124. Another table presents a pairwise comparison matrix for six management capacity criteria labeled “C 51”, “C 52”, “C 53”, “C 54”, “C 55”, and “C 56”. Both the rows and columns are labeled with these criteria. The data from the rows are as follows: Row “C 51”: C 51: 1.000, 1.000, 1.000; C 52: 2.224, 2.508, 2.889; C 53: 2.233, 3.175, 2.797; C 54: 1.243, 2.244, 1.977; C 55: 1.613, 2.465, 2.374; C 56: 0.757, 0.806, 1.252 Row “C 52”: C 51: 0.346, 0.399, 0.450; C 52: 1.000, 1.000, 1.000; C 53: 1.873, 2.298, 3.089; C 54: 1.028, 2.041, 1.655; C 55: 1.397, 2.371, 3.245; C 56: 1.024, 1.739, 2.398 Row “C 53”: C 51: 0.358, 0.315, 0.448; C 52: 0.324, 0.435, 0.534; C 53: 1.000, 1.000, 1.000; C 54: 1.744, 2.809, 3.053; C 55: 0.975, 1.257, 1.745; C 56: 1.173, 1.468, 2.065 Row “C 54”: C 51: 0.506, 0.446, 0.805; C 52: 0.604, 0.490, 0.972; C 53: 0.328, 0.356, 0.573; C 54: 1.000, 1.000, 1.000; C 55: 0.538, 0.650, 0.939; C 56: 1.115, 1.477, 1.917 Row “C 55”: C 51: 2.374, 0.406, 0.421; C 52: 0.308, 0.422, 0.716; C 53: 0.573, 0.796, 1.026; C 54: 1.066, 1.539, 1.858; C 55: 1.000, 1.000, 1.000; C 56: 0.984, 1.368, 1.825. Below the matrix, a note states, “Y prime max equals 6.55, C I equals 0.11 and C R equals 0.08”. At the bottom, a chart titled “Management capacity” presents horizontal bars for six criteria with values ranging from 0.000 to 0.300 with an interval of 0.050. The categories and values are “Management Knowledge (C 51)” at 0.263, “Quality, Time and Cost Management (C 52)” at 0.209, “Contract Management (C 53)” at 0.150, “Risk Management (C 54)” at 0.116, “Understanding Insight of the Project (C 55)” at 0.137, and “Coordination with clients and or consultants (C 56)” at 0.124. Note: All numerical data values are approximated. |
