Table 9.

Indicators That Impact on Managers’ Attitudes Towards Whistleblowing. Linear Regression (1 = Totally Disagree, 5 = Totally Agree).

 Right to ManageCorrect Wrongdoings
BStd. ErrorStd. BetaBStd. ErrorStd. Beta
Constant1,958***0.363 4,411***0.350 
No employee representation0.2540.0730.095−0.1580.0710.095
Collective agreement0.1250.0740.047−0.0290.0720.045
Whistleblowing procedures−0.1080.079−0.0340.1080.076−0.032
Denmark0.1550.1120.040−0.333***0.1080.038
England0.295***0.0880.113−0.162**0.0840.111
Ireland0.476***0.1090.140−0.182**0.1060.138
Know the law0.0780.0810.026−0.0080.0770.026
Born in another country0.1910.1120.0410.0710.1090.041
Woman−0.0250.067−0.010−0.0130.064−0.011
Age−0.0050.003−0.0500.006***0.003−0.051
Education: Level 10.0390.1280.008−0.223**0.1240.006
Education: Level 20.140**0.0680.052−0.123**0.0660.053
Managerial position0.235***0.0680.090−0.0860.0660.089
No. of employees: Up to 490.10.10.040.0900.0830.006
No. of employees: btw 50–199−0.1180.1−0.040.160**0.092−0.041
No. of employees: 1,000 and more−0.060.11−0.020.0850.091−0.059
Sector (0 = private, 1 = public)−0.0010.002−0.008−0.0020.002−0.009
Received WB cases0.018***0.0930.0050.006**0.0890.004
N1,653  1,706  
Adjusted R20.06  0.05  

Constant: employee representation, no collective agreement, no whistleblowing procedures, Norway, no knowledge of the law, nationals, man, education: level 3, mid-level manager, numbers of employees: 200–999, private sector, not received WB cases. **p < 0.05, ***p < 0.01.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal