Variable specification
| Variables | Description | Data source |
|---|---|---|
| Ln (1 + Dividend) | Natural logarithm of 1 plus the amount of dividend declared on common shares | Compustat |
| Dividend Per Share | Ratio of dividends declared on common shares to the total number of shares outstanding | Compustat |
| Biodiversity_Regulation | The 10 K-Biodiversity-Regulation Score measures firm exposure to biodiversity risks related to regulations. It assigns a score of “1” if a firm's 10-K statement contains at least two sentences mentioning biodiversity risks and at least one of these sentences references regulatory terms such as laws, regulations, or restrictions; otherwise, it assigns a score of “0” | Giglio et al. (2026) |
| Biodiversity_Negative | The 10 K-Biodiversity-Negative Score assesses the sentiment of biodiversity mentions in firms' 10-K statements. Using the BERT model for sentiment analysis, this score specifically counts biodiversity-related sentences with negative sentiment, indicating perceived risks rather than opportunities | Giglio et al. (2026) |
| Biodiversity_Count | 10 K-Biodiversity-Count Score quantifies biodiversity risk exposure based on textual analysis of firms' 10-K statements. A score of “1” is assigned if a statement includes at least two sentences related to biodiversity; otherwise, a score of “0” is given | Giglio et al. (2026) |
| PPE to Assets | Ratio of Property, Plants and Equipment to total assets | Compustat |
| CAPEX Ratio | Ratio of capital expenditure to total assets | Compustat |
| Leverage | Sum of current and long-term liabilities divided by total assets | Compustat |
| ROA | Ratio of net income to total assets | Compustat |
| Firm Size (Ln (Total Assets)) | Natural logarithm of total assets | Compustat |
| Market to Book Equity | Ratio of market to book value of total equity | Compustat |
| Cash Flow Ratio | Ratio of operating income before depreciation minus interest expenses, taxes, and common dividends, all divided by the book value of assets | Compustat |
| Net Working Capital | Difference between current operating assets and current operating liabilities divided by total assets | Compustat |
| High Financial Constraint | Dummy variable taking the value of 1 if the firm has higher than median values of the “delaycon” measure – facing risk of delaying their investments due to issues with liquidity | Hoberg and Maksimovic (2015) |
| High WW Index | Dummy variable taking the value of 1 if the firm has higher than median values of the Whited-Wu index where BA is the book value of total assets, DIVPOS is a dummy variable, equal to 1 if the dividend is positive. LD denotes long-term debt, Size is the logarithm of total assets, SG is sales growth and ISG means industrial sales growth | Author Constructed |
| RE/TE | Ratio of earned equity to total common equity | Compustat |
| RE/TA | Ratio of earned equity to total assets | Compustat |
| CEO Age | Age of the CEO of the firm | Execucomp |
| Variables | Description | Data source |
|---|---|---|
| Ln (1 + Dividend) | Natural logarithm of 1 plus the amount of dividend declared on common shares | Compustat |
| Dividend Per Share | Ratio of dividends declared on common shares to the total number of shares outstanding | Compustat |
| Biodiversity_Regulation | The 10 K-Biodiversity-Regulation Score measures firm exposure to biodiversity risks related to regulations. It assigns a score of “1” if a firm's 10-K statement contains at least two sentences mentioning biodiversity risks and at least one of these sentences references regulatory terms such as laws, regulations, or restrictions; otherwise, it assigns a score of “0” | |
| Biodiversity_Negative | The 10 K-Biodiversity-Negative Score assesses the sentiment of biodiversity mentions in firms' 10-K statements. Using the BERT model for sentiment analysis, this score specifically counts biodiversity-related sentences with negative sentiment, indicating perceived risks rather than opportunities | |
| Biodiversity_Count | 10 K-Biodiversity-Count Score quantifies biodiversity risk exposure based on textual analysis of firms' 10-K statements. A score of “1” is assigned if a statement includes at least two sentences related to biodiversity; otherwise, a score of “0” is given | |
| PPE to Assets | Ratio of Property, Plants and Equipment to total assets | Compustat |
| CAPEX Ratio | Ratio of capital expenditure to total assets | Compustat |
| Leverage | Sum of current and long-term liabilities divided by total assets | Compustat |
| ROA | Ratio of net income to total assets | Compustat |
| Firm Size (Ln (Total Assets)) | Natural logarithm of total assets | Compustat |
| Market to Book Equity | Ratio of market to book value of total equity | Compustat |
| Cash Flow Ratio | Ratio of operating income before depreciation minus interest expenses, taxes, and common dividends, all divided by the book value of assets | Compustat |
| Net Working Capital | Difference between current operating assets and current operating liabilities divided by total assets | Compustat |
| High Financial Constraint | Dummy variable taking the value of 1 if the firm has higher than median values of the “delaycon” measure – facing risk of delaying their investments due to issues with liquidity | |
| High WW Index | Dummy variable taking the value of 1 if the firm has higher than median values of the Whited-Wu index | Author Constructed |
| RE/TE | Ratio of earned equity to total common equity | Compustat |
| RE/TA | Ratio of earned equity to total assets | Compustat |
| CEO Age | Age of the CEO of the firm | Execucomp |
Year-wise percentage distribution of biodiversity risk measures (BioRegulation and BioCount)
| Year | Regulation | Count |
|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 0.55% | 1.17% |
| 2002 | 0.36% | 0.73% |
| 2003 | 1.10% | 2.00% |
| 2004 | 0.70% | 1.52% |
| 2005 | 0.77% | 1.98% |
| 2006 | 0.98% | 1.96% |
| 2007 | 1.32% | 2.21% |
| 2008 | 1.36% | 2.33% |
| 2009 | 1.26% | 2.17% |
| 2010 | 1.66% | 2.65% |
| 2011 | 1.85% | 2.97% |
| 2012 | 2.40% | 3.73% |
| 2013 | 2.33% | 3.08% |
| 2014 | 2.86% | 3.88% |
| 2015 | 2.73% | 3.98% |
| 2016 | 3.16% | 4.58% |
| 2017 | 4.24% | 5.28% |
| 2018 | 4.57% | 5.51% |
| 2019 | 3.61% | 4.74% |
| 2020 | 3.60% | 4.75% |
| Year | Regulation | Count |
|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 0.55% | 1.17% |
| 2002 | 0.36% | 0.73% |
| 2003 | 1.10% | 2.00% |
| 2004 | 0.70% | 1.52% |
| 2005 | 0.77% | 1.98% |
| 2006 | 0.98% | 1.96% |
| 2007 | 1.32% | 2.21% |
| 2008 | 1.36% | 2.33% |
| 2009 | 1.26% | 2.17% |
| 2010 | 1.66% | 2.65% |
| 2011 | 1.85% | 2.97% |
| 2012 | 2.40% | 3.73% |
| 2013 | 2.33% | 3.08% |
| 2014 | 2.86% | 3.88% |
| 2015 | 2.73% | 3.98% |
| 2016 | 3.16% | 4.58% |
| 2017 | 4.24% | 5.28% |
| 2018 | 4.57% | 5.51% |
| 2019 | 3.61% | 4.74% |
| 2020 | 3.60% | 4.75% |
Correlation matrix between the biodiversity risk measures
| Regulation | Count | Negative | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regulation | 1.0000 | ||
| Count | 0.8179 | 1.0000 | |
| Negative | 0.4809 | 0.3975 | 1.0000 |
| Regulation | Count | Negative | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regulation | 1.0000 | ||
| Count | 0.8179 | 1.0000 | |
| Negative | 0.4809 | 0.3975 | 1.0000 |
Baseline regression results for the restricted sample of firms exposed to biodiversity risk, paying dividends and estimations using lagged independent variables
| Dependent variable | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ln (1 + dividend) | Dividend payout ratio | Ln (1 + dividend) | Dividend payout ratio | Ln (1 + dividend) | Dividend payout ratio | |
| BioRegulation | −0.4511*** | −0.0709*** | −0.8247*** | −0.0803*** | −0.3848*** | −0.0815*** |
| (0.0909) | (0.0250) | (0.0923) | (0.0303) | (0.0812) | (0.0228) | |
| Constant | −3.9464*** | −0.1597* | −3.8396*** | 0.5038*** | −3.8037*** | −0.0205* |
| (0.3651) | (0.0819) | (0.1236) | (0.0408) | (0.0760) | (0.0113) | |
| Observations | 1,793 | 1,778 | 15,905 | 15,890 | 27,522 | 27,492 |
| Adjusted R-squared | 0.5953 | 0.0717 | 0.4801 | 0.0740 | 0.4348 | 0.1027 |
| Controls | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Year FE | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Industry FE | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Dependent variable | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ln (1 + dividend) | Dividend payout ratio | Ln (1 + dividend) | Dividend payout ratio | Ln (1 + dividend) | Dividend payout ratio | |
| BioRegulation | −0.4511*** | −0.0709*** | −0.8247*** | −0.0803*** | −0.3848*** | −0.0815*** |
| (0.0909) | (0.0250) | (0.0923) | (0.0303) | (0.0812) | (0.0228) | |
| Constant | −3.9464*** | −0.1597* | −3.8396*** | 0.5038*** | −3.8037*** | −0.0205* |
| (0.3651) | (0.0819) | (0.1236) | (0.0408) | (0.0760) | (0.0113) | |
| Observations | 1,793 | 1,778 | 15,905 | 15,890 | 27,522 | 27,492 |
| Adjusted | 0.5953 | 0.0717 | 0.4801 | 0.0740 | 0.4348 | 0.1027 |
| Controls | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Year FE | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Industry FE | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
Note(s): In this table, the baseline regression model is estimated for the restricted sample of firms that are exposed to biodiversity risk and paid a dividend during the time period of 2001–2020 and estimations considering the lagged independent variables. Ln (1 + Dividend) and Dividend Payout Ratio are the dependent variables in specifications 1, 3 and 5, and 2, 4 and 6, respectively. Specifications 5 and 6 considers the lagged independent variables of the baseline model. Year and industry fixed effects are taken into account in all specifications. Appendix Table A1 provides a thorough explanation of every variable. Robust standard errors, clustered at the firm level, are in parentheses. Significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels is denoted by the symbols ***, **, and *, respectively
Re-estimated baseline regressions using average dividend payout ratio over the last 3 years as the dependent variable
| Dependent variable: average dividend payout ratio | (1) | (2) |
|---|---|---|
| BioRegulation | −0.0659*** | |
| (0.0157) | ||
| BioCount | −0.0704*** | |
| (0.0118) | ||
| PPE to Assets | 0.1386*** | 0.1405*** |
| (0.0122) | (0.0122) | |
| CAPEX Ratio | −0.1199*** | −0.1201*** |
| (0.0277) | (0.0227) | |
| Leverage | 0.0094 | 0.0098 |
| (0.0106) | (0.0106) | |
| ROA | 0.2566*** | 0.2563*** |
| (0.0225) | (0.0224) | |
| Firm Size | 0.0197*** | 0.0198*** |
| (0.0015) | (0.0015) | |
| Market to Book Equity | −0.0002** | −0.0002* |
| (0.0000) | (0.0000) | |
| Cash Flow to Assets | 0.0385*** | 0.0379*** |
| (0.0133) | (0.0132) | |
| Net Working Capital | 0.0144 | 0.0146 |
| (0.0134) | (0.0133) | |
| Constant | −0.0374*** | −0.0374*** |
| (0.0114) | (0.0114) | |
| Observations | 26,798 | 26,798 |
| Adjusted R-squared | 0.1633 | 0.1613 |
| Year FE | YES | YES |
| Industry FE | YES | YES |
| Dependent variable: average dividend payout ratio | (1) | (2) |
|---|---|---|
| BioRegulation | −0.0659*** | |
| (0.0157) | ||
| BioCount | −0.0704*** | |
| (0.0118) | ||
| PPE to Assets | 0.1386*** | 0.1405*** |
| (0.0122) | (0.0122) | |
| CAPEX Ratio | −0.1199*** | −0.1201*** |
| (0.0277) | (0.0227) | |
| Leverage | 0.0094 | 0.0098 |
| (0.0106) | (0.0106) | |
| ROA | 0.2566*** | 0.2563*** |
| (0.0225) | (0.0224) | |
| Firm Size | 0.0197*** | 0.0198*** |
| (0.0015) | (0.0015) | |
| Market to Book Equity | −0.0002** | −0.0002* |
| (0.0000) | (0.0000) | |
| Cash Flow to Assets | 0.0385*** | 0.0379*** |
| (0.0133) | (0.0132) | |
| Net Working Capital | 0.0144 | 0.0146 |
| (0.0134) | (0.0133) | |
| Constant | −0.0374*** | −0.0374*** |
| (0.0114) | (0.0114) | |
| Observations | 26,798 | 26,798 |
| Adjusted | 0.1633 | 0.1613 |
| Year FE | YES | YES |
| Industry FE | YES | YES |
The effect of the 2015 Paris agreement signing
| Dependent variable | (1) | (2) |
|---|---|---|
| Ln (1 + dividend) | Dividend per share | |
| Paris Agreement Signing × Regulation | −0.3719** | −0.1535** |
| (0.1850) | (0.0641) | |
| Paris Agreement Signing | 0.1313*** | −0.0001 |
| (0.0321) | (0.0092) | |
| Regulation | −0.4306*** | −0.0214 |
| (0.1294) | (0.0554) | |
| Constant | −4.2780*** | −0.0328 |
| (0.1015) | (0.0333) | |
| Observations | 6,034 | 6,015 |
| Adjusted R-squared | 0.4208 | 0.1031 |
| Controls | YES | YES |
| Year FE | NO | NO |
| Industry FE | YES | YES |
| Dependent variable | (1) | (2) |
|---|---|---|
| Ln (1 + dividend) | Dividend per share | |
| Paris Agreement Signing × Regulation | −0.3719** | −0.1535** |
| (0.1850) | (0.0641) | |
| Paris Agreement Signing | 0.1313*** | −0.0001 |
| (0.0321) | (0.0092) | |
| Regulation | −0.4306*** | −0.0214 |
| (0.1294) | (0.0554) | |
| Constant | −4.2780*** | −0.0328 |
| (0.1015) | (0.0333) | |
| Observations | 6,034 | 6,015 |
| Adjusted | 0.4208 | 0.1031 |
| Controls | YES | YES |
| Year FE | NO | NO |
| Industry FE | YES | YES |
Note(s): This table shows result for the effect of the 2015 Paris Agreement Signing. The Paris Agreement Signing is a dummy variable for years 2015 onwards. Ln (1 + Dividend) is the dependent variable in specification 1, and Dividend Payout Ratio is the dependent variable in specification 2. Industry fixed effects are taken into account in both specifications. Appendix Table A1 provides an explanation of each variable. Robust standard errors, clustered at the firm level, are in parentheses. Significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels is denoted by the symbols ***, **, and *, respectively
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.