Table 4

Channel analysis: the impact of managerial financial experience in regulatory and non-regulatory authorities on tax aggressiveness

Dependent variable = ETR1ETR1ETR2ETR2BTD1BTD1BTD2BTD2
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)
Regulatory financial0.005 0.001 0.002 −0.001 
(0.285) (0.065) (0.972) (−0.488) 
NonregulatoryFinancial−0.010*** −0.005** 0.002*** 0.001*** 
(−3.073) (−2.061) (4.253) (2.687) 
RegulatoryFinancial_Ratio 0.019 0.056 0.005 −0.018
 (0.260) (0.882) (0.440) (−1.316)
NonregulatoryFinancial_Ratio −0.032** −0.026* 0.013*** 0.010***
 (−1.982) (−1.923) (4.531) (3.729)
SOE0.0030.0040.008**0.008**−0.001−0.001−0.001−0.001
(0.839)(0.980)(2.515)(2.561)(−1.555)(−1.610)(−0.909)(−0.887)
Size0.011***0.011***0.007***0.007***−0.001***−0.001***−0.000−0.000
(7.396)(7.266)(5.968)(5.863)(−3.066)(−2.851)(−0.782)(−0.628)
Age−0.001−0.0000.003**0.004**0.003***0.003***0.002***0.002***
(−0.301)(−0.190)(2.386)(2.485)(8.283)(8.051)(5.191)(5.025)
Tangibility0.0250.0250.030**0.030**0.008**0.007**0.006**0.006**
(1.409)(1.421)(2.097)(2.113)(2.493)(2.456)(2.069)(2.049)
Lev0.030***0.030***0.0050.005−0.004**−0.004**−0.004**−0.004**
(3.091)(3.097)(0.621)(0.630)(−2.256)(−2.275)(−2.469)(−2.485)
RD−0.706***−0.702***−0.816***−0.816***0.163***0.164***0.157***0.158***
(−6.846)(−6.802)(−9.899)(−9.888)(8.755)(8.802)(8.296)(8.349)
ROA0.139***0.141***0.257***0.258***0.041***0.040***0.044***0.044***
(4.699)(4.767)(10.440)(10.491)(5.653)(5.554)(6.765)(6.699)
Growth0.012***0.012***0.013***0.013***0.001*0.001*0.001***0.001***
(4.634)(4.652)(6.041)(6.063)(1.829)(1.765)(3.093)(3.045)
Duality0.0020.002−0.001−0.001−0.000−0.0000.0000.000
(0.536)(0.545)(−0.343)(−0.324)(−0.285)(−0.328)(0.325)(0.280)
Independence0.0410.0410.0290.0290.007*0.007*−0.001−0.001
(1.491)(1.496)(1.340)(1.351)(1.687)(1.666)(−0.198)(−0.222)
Female0.027*0.027*0.023**0.023**−0.001−0.001−0.002−0.002
(1.786)(1.803)(2.005)(2.018)(−0.252)(−0.294)(−0.995)(−1.028)
Loss−0.019**−0.019**−0.012*−0.012*0.008***0.008***0.007***0.007***
(−2.225)(−2.217)(−1.695)(−1.683)(6.773)(6.741)(5.737)(5.704)
TotalAccruals−0.012−0.013−0.072***−0.072***−0.004−0.004−0.023***−0.023***
(−0.611)(−0.647)(−4.463)(−4.473)(−0.972)(−0.952)(−6.079)(−6.087)
TMT_Age−0.016−0.0160.0150.015−0.006**−0.006*−0.002−0.002
(−0.789)(−0.754)(0.928)(0.925)(−1.984)(−1.883)(−0.591)(−0.486)
TMT_Foreign0.0230.023−0.008−0.0080.000−0.000−0.000−0.001
(1.506)(1.484)(−0.711)(−0.700)(0.046)(−0.033)(−0.165)(−0.263)
TMT_Academic0.0050.005−0.005−0.005−0.002−0.002−0.003−0.003*
(0.485)(0.481)(−0.610)(−0.618)(−1.008)(−1.092)(−1.621)(−1.693)
_cons−0.187**−0.187**−0.210***−0.209***0.072***0.069***0.044***0.042***
(−2.189)(−2.186)(−3.109)(−3.081)(5.211)(5.043)(3.278)(3.127)
Year fixed effects?YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Industry fixed effects?YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Province fixed effects?YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
SEs. Clustered atFirm, YearFirm, YearFirm, YearFirm, YearFirm, YearFirm, YearFirm, YearFirm, Year
No. of obs18,25318,25321,91221,91215,74615,74615,66715,667
Adj. R-square0.0580.0570.0660.0660.1170.1170.0980.099

Note(s): The table presents the empirical results on the relationship between top managers' financial experience in regulatory and non-regulatory authorities and corporate tax aggressiveness. Regulatory Financial is a dummy variable equal to one if any top managers have prior financial work experience in regulatory-oriented institutions—such as regulatory commissions, policy banks, or stock exchanges—and zero otherwise. Nonregulatory Financial equals one if any top managers previously worked in non-regulatory financial authorities, and zero otherwise. Regulatory Financial_Ratio is defined as the proportion of top managers with prior financial experience in regulatory-oriented authorities relative to the total number of top managers in the firm. Similarly, Nonregulatory Financial_Ratio measures the proportion of top managers with experience in non-regulatory financial institutions. All independent variables are lagged by one year except for Growth and Loss. Detailed variable definitions can be found in Table A1 of the Appendix section. ***, **, and * denote significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels, respectively

Source(s): Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal