Table 1

Foundational constructs of TFDT

ConstructReferencesDefinitionSource Discipline(s)Relevance for tourism futures
TimeBrier (2005), Fowles (1974), Lichty (2023), Nordlund (2012), Pöppel (2009) Temporal orientation of past, present, and future; includes linear, cyclical and subjective perspectivesFutures studies, philosophy, cultural studies, physicsShapes how tourism scenarios are constructed (planning horizons, memories, seasonality, long-term strategies)
SpaceBuhalis et al. (2023), Córdoba Azcárate (2025), Dhami et al. (2022), Filimonau et al. (2024), Leiper (1990), Prideaux (2000), Rosselló et al. (2020), Schroeder (1993) The physical and virtual environments within which tourism occursGeography, digital studies, physicsDestinations, attractions, networks, mobility systems and virtual spaces (e.g. metaverse)
AgencyBrassett (2021), Granjou et al. (2017), Hall (2011), Lee et al.(2010), Jamal and Getz (1995), Milano et al. (2024), Roxas et al. (2020) The capacity of actors to shape futures; distinguished as protagonists (supportive) and antagonists (oppositional)Sociology, management, political scienceStakeholders such as governments, businesses, NGOs and communities influence which futures become plausible
UncertaintyBevan (2022), Buhalis and Law (2008), Koçak et al. (2023), Lee et al. (2021), Navío-Marco et al. (2018), Rosselló et al. (2020), Scott et al. (2019) The degree to which outcomes are indeterminate, unpredictable or probabilisticFutures studies, decision theoryShocks (e.g. pandemics), risks (e.g. climate) and surprises (e.g. disruptive technologies) frame the plausibility of scenarios
EntropyFloyd (2007), Funtowicz and Ravetz (1997), Li et al. (2025), Shannon (1948), Wehrl (1978) The universal tendency of systems towards “disorder” unless sustained by energy inputThermodynamics, information theoryExplains why scenarios decay, why energy and management effort are required to sustain tourism futures

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal