Table 2. Hypotheses testing Path β p... | Emerald Publishing

Table 2.

Hypotheses testing

Path	β	p	Samplemean	95% CI*		Conclusion
Path	β	p	Samplemean	2.50%	97.50%	Conclusion
H1. Perceived coolness → Hedonic experience	0.73	<0.001	0.73	0.67	0.78	Supported
H2. Perceived coolness → Cognitive experience	0.68	<0.001	0.68	0.60	0.75	Supported
H3. Perceived coolness → Personal experience	0.61	<0.001	0.61	0.53	0.68	Supported
H4a. Hedonic experience → Subjective well-being	0.19	<0.001	0.19	0.11	0.27	Supported
H4b. Hedonic experience → Revisit intention	0.49	<0.001	0.49	0.41	0.57	Supported
H5a. Cognitive experience → Subjective well-being	0.40	<0.001	0.40	0.28	0.52	Supported
H5b. Cognitive experience → Revisit intention	0.27	<0.001	0.27	0.12	0.40	Supported
H6a. Personal experience → Subjective well-being	0.41	<0.001	0.41	0.29	0.53	Supported
H6b. Personal experience → Revisit intention	0.19	<0.001	0.19	0.05	0.32	Supported

Path	β	p	Samplemean	95% CI*		Conclusion
Path	β	p	Samplemean	2.50%	97.50%	Conclusion
H1. Perceived coolness → Hedonic experience	0.73	<0.001	0.73	0.67	0.78	Supported
H2. Perceived coolness → Cognitive experience	0.68	<0.001	0.68	0.60	0.75	Supported
H3. Perceived coolness → Personal experience	0.61	<0.001	0.61	0.53	0.68	Supported
H4a. Hedonic experience → Subjective well-being	0.19	<0.001	0.19	0.11	0.27	Supported
H4b. Hedonic experience → Revisit intention	0.49	<0.001	0.49	0.41	0.57	Supported
H5a. Cognitive experience → Subjective well-being	0.40	<0.001	0.40	0.28	0.52	Supported
H5b. Cognitive experience → Revisit intention	0.27	<0.001	0.27	0.12	0.40	Supported
H6a. Personal experience → Subjective well-being	0.41	<0.001	0.41	0.29	0.53	Supported
H6b. Personal experience → Revisit intention	0.19	<0.001	0.19	0.05	0.32	Supported

Source(s): Authors’ own work