Table 2. Findings of direct paths...

Table 2.

Findings of direct paths

Indices	Direct paths	Standardized estimates	t-value	Relationship
χ² = 1.562, df = 1, χ²/df = 1.562, AGFI = 0.946, CFI = 0.929, TLI = 0.921, and RMSEA = 0.041	Direct paths
	H1. SQ → CC	0.758	7.599	Supported
	H2. PE → CC	0.437	5.638	Supported
	H3. TE → CC	0.684	6.860	Supported
	H4. CC → CR	0.537	5.174	Supported
	H5. CC → VI	0.501	6.216	Supported
	H6. CC → FS	0.637	5.754	Supported
	H7. SQ*CC → CQ	0.794	6.387	Supported
	H8. PE*CC → CQ	0.437	5.609	Supported
	H9. TE*CC → CQ	0.655	6.286	Supported

Indices	Direct paths	Standardized estimates	t-value	Relationship
χ² = 1.562, df = 1, χ²/df = 1.562, AGFI = 0.946, CFI = 0.929, TLI = 0.921, and RMSEA = 0.041	Direct paths
	H1. SQ → CC	0.758	7.599	Supported
	H2. PE → CC	0.437	5.638	Supported
	H3. TE → CC	0.684	6.860	Supported
	H4. CC → CR	0.537	5.174	Supported
	H5. CC → VI	0.501	6.216	Supported
	H6. CC → FS	0.637	5.754	Supported
	H7. SQ*CC → CQ	0.794	6.387	Supported
	H8. PE*CC → CQ	0.437	5.609	Supported
	H9. TE*CC → CQ	0.655	6.286	Supported

Note(s):

SQ = stimulus quality; PE = perceived enjoyment; TE = telepresence; CC = cultural curiosity; CR = cultural reproduction support; VI = visiting intention; FS = food culture sustainability; CQ = cultural intelligence; ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable