Table 3. Direct and indirect effects of...

Table 3.

Direct and indirect effects of perceived self-efficacy on career satisfaction through protean career orientation

		Bootstrapping 95% CI
Variables	β	LLCI	ULCI
Direct effects on Protean career orientation (PCO)
Perceived self-efficacy (PSE)	0.49***	0.36	0.61
Age	−0.03***	−0.05	−0.01
Gender	−0.03	−0.25	0.19
Marital status	−0.07	−0.30	0.16
Direct effects on Career satisfaction (CS)
Perceived self-efficacy	0.24*	0.01	0.46
Protean career orientation (PCO)	0.25*	0.04	0.47
Age	−0.02	−0.06	0.01
Gender	−0.44**	−0.79	−0.10
Marital status	0.13	−0.24	0.50
Indirect effect of PSE on CS through PCO	0.12	0.03	0.23

		Bootstrapping 95% CI
Variables	β	LLCI	ULCI
Direct effects on Protean career orientation (PCO)
Perceived self-efficacy (PSE)	0.49***	0.36	0.61
Age	−0.03***	−0.05	−0.01
Gender	−0.03	−0.25	0.19
Marital status	−0.07	−0.30	0.16
Direct effects on Career satisfaction (CS)
Perceived self-efficacy	0.24*	0.01	0.46
Protean career orientation (PCO)	0.25*	0.04	0.47
Age	−0.02	−0.06	0.01
Gender	−0.44**	−0.79	−0.10
Marital status	0.13	−0.24	0.50
Indirect effect of PSE on CS through PCO	0.12	0.03	0.23

Note(s): ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05; LLCI = lower limit confidence interval, ULCI = upper limit confidence interval. 50,000 bootstrap samples. Process macro (Model 4)

Source(s): Authors’ own work

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable