Table 4. Moderation analysis: Identity...

Table 4.

Moderation analysis: Identity conflict and entrepreneurial intention (n = 110)

Predictors	Model 1 (Family) β	Model 2 (Income) β	Model 3 (Hebrew) β	Model 4 (Course) β
Control variables
Appreciation for entrepreneurship	0.471***	0.468***	0.463***	0.469***
Social support	0.098	0.095	0.093	0.097
Gender (Male = 1)	0.064	0.061	0.059	0.062
Main effects
Identity conflict (IC)	0.199**	0.208**	0.205***	0.212**
Moderator	0.117	−0.096	−0.126**	0.083
Interaction term
IC × moderator	−0.238	−0.168**	−0.169**	0.079
Model fit
R²	0.487	0.491	0.507	0.489
ΔR² (Interaction)	0.009	0.011	0.010	0.002
ΔR² Significance	n.s.	n.s.	n.s.	n.s.

Predictors	Model 1 (Family) β	Model 2 (Income) β	Model 3 (Hebrew) β	Model 4 (Course) β
Control variables
Appreciation for entrepreneurship	0.471***	0.468***	0.463***	0.469***
Social support	0.098	0.095	0.093	0.097
Gender (Male = 1)	0.064	0.061	0.059	0.062
Main effects
Identity conflict (IC)	0.199**	0.208**	0.205***	0.212**
Moderator	0.117	−0.096	−0.126**	0.083
Interaction term
IC × moderator	−0.238	−0.168**	−0.169**	0.079
Model fit
R²	0.487	0.491	0.507	0.489
ΔR² (Interaction)	0.009	0.011	0.010	0.002
ΔR² Significance	n.s.	n.s.	n.s.	n.s.

Note(s):

Standardized beta coefficients are reported. Continuous predictors were mean-centered. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001

Source(s): Authors’ own elaboration

Sharing Unavailable