Table 6 Hypotheses testing Relationship...

Table 6

Hypotheses testing

Relationship	Hypotheses	Standardized β	t-value bootstrap
H1a: Priorities heads of R&D areas → Proactivity of the center	Accepted	−0.099^**	1.821
H1b: Priorities heads of R&D areas → Effectiveness (International projects gained by the center)	Accepted	−0.163^*	1.523
H2a: RMO incentives → Proactivity of the center	Accepted	0.163^**	2.08
H2b: RMO incentives → Effectiveness (International projects gained by the center)	Rejected	0.025^n.s	0.719
H3a: RMO workload → Proactivity of the center	Accepted	0.428^***	3.002
H3b: RMO workload → Effectiveness (International projects gained by the center)	Accepted	0.260^***	2.924
No. of researchers in the center → Proactivity of the center	Rejected	0.126^n.s	1.248
No. of researchers in the center → Effectiveness (International projects gained by the center)	Rejected	0.048n.s	0.85
No. of researchers in the center → RMO workload	Accepted	0.629^***	7.459

Relationship	Hypotheses	Standardized β	t-value bootstrap
H1a: Priorities heads of R&D areas → Proactivity of the center	Accepted	−0.099^**	1.821
H1b: Priorities heads of R&D areas → Effectiveness (International projects gained by the center)	Accepted	−0.163^*	1.523
H2a: RMO incentives → Proactivity of the center	Accepted	0.163^**	2.08
H2b: RMO incentives → Effectiveness (International projects gained by the center)	Rejected	0.025^n.s	0.719
H3a: RMO workload → Proactivity of the center	Accepted	0.428^***	3.002
H3b: RMO workload → Effectiveness (International projects gained by the center)	Accepted	0.260^***	2.924
No. of researchers in the center → Proactivity of the center	Rejected	0.126^n.s	1.248
No. of researchers in the center → Effectiveness (International projects gained by the center)	Rejected	0.048n.s	0.85
No. of researchers in the center → RMO workload	Accepted	0.629^***	7.459

Note(s): ^*p < 0.1; ^** p < 0.05; ^*** p < 0.01

R² (workload of RMO) = 0.396; R² (proactivity of the center) = 0.355; R² (efficacy or international projects gained by the center) = 0.696

Q² (workload of RMO) = 0.395; Q² (proactivity of the center) = 0.240; Q² (efficacy or international projects gained by the center) = 0.264

Source(s): Authors’ elaboration

Sharing Unavailable