Condition–mechanism–outcome framework of older adults’ smart tourism engagement
| Condition category | Key mechanisms | Cross-condition interactions | Behavioral outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|
| User-related conditions characteristics, demand, self-efficacy | Shape internal readiness through physical and cognitive capacity, confidence and needs alignment. Define the necessity of adoption | Interact with technological and tourism-specific conditions to shape behavioral outcomes by determining ability, opportunity and necessity; social support can offset limited abilities and boost confidence; positive norms reinforce adoption, while proxy reliance or age stereotypes reduce initiative | High readiness + supportive context→ active use; readiness undermined by constraints→ limited/non-use |
| Technological conditions digital distance, use barriers, tech-related risks, functionality | Shape opportunities and readiness through usability, reliability and safety, while narrowing digital distance via increased acceptance and exposure frequency | Interact with user and tourism-specific conditions to shape behavioral outcomes; social support narrows digital distance, reduces risks and encourages trial, while proxy reliance, negative norms and environmental constraints amplify barriers and discourage engagement | Facilitative tech + high readiness→ active use; barriers, distrust or widened distance → limited/non-use |
| Tourism-specific conditions travel constraints, infrastructure, limitations | Mobility capacity and facility adequacy determine necessity and feasibility by enabling or limiting opportunities for independent digital engagement | Amplify or diminish the effects of user and technological conditions; social mechanisms – through peer influence, encouragement and resource sharing – can ease situational constraints, yet infrastructure gaps without adequate support may suppress engagement even when personal skills are sufficient | Adequate facilities + mobility → active use; constraints dominate → limited/non-use regardless of skills |
| Embedded social mechanisms social support, social norms, economic incentives | Moderate ability–opportunity–necessity alignment through encouragement, imitation, pressure and resource provision | Moderate all other condition interactions: support and positive norms amplify facilitators and reduce resistance; economic incentives reinforce sustained use; proxy reliance, negative norms and stereotypes weaken positive effects | Supportive norms/support → active use; proxy reliance/stereotypes → limited/non-use |
| Feedback mechanisms experience satisfaction | Positive experiences build confidence and promote peer diffusion; negative experiences reduce motivation and engagement | Feedback alter user readiness (confidence, skills), technology perceptions (trust, usability) and social environment (peer views), reshaping subsequent interactions | Positive feedback → sustain/expand use; negative feedback → withdraw/avoid |
| Condition category | Key mechanisms | Cross-condition interactions | Behavioral outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shape internal readiness through physical and cognitive capacity, confidence and needs alignment. Define the necessity of adoption | Interact with technological and tourism-specific conditions to shape behavioral outcomes by determining ability, opportunity and necessity; social support can offset limited abilities and boost confidence; positive norms reinforce adoption, while proxy reliance or age stereotypes reduce initiative | High readiness + supportive context→ active use; readiness undermined by constraints→ limited/non-use | |
| Shape opportunities and readiness through usability, reliability and safety, while narrowing digital distance via increased acceptance and exposure frequency | Interact with user and tourism-specific conditions to shape behavioral outcomes; social support narrows digital distance, reduces risks and encourages trial, while proxy reliance, negative norms and environmental constraints amplify barriers and discourage engagement | Facilitative tech + high readiness→ active use; barriers, distrust or widened distance → limited/non-use | |
| Mobility capacity and facility adequacy determine necessity and feasibility by enabling or limiting opportunities for independent digital engagement | Amplify or diminish the effects of user and technological conditions; social mechanisms – through peer influence, encouragement and resource sharing – can ease situational constraints, yet infrastructure gaps without adequate support may suppress engagement even when personal skills are sufficient | Adequate facilities + mobility → active use; constraints dominate → limited/non-use regardless of skills | |
| Moderate ability–opportunity–necessity alignment through encouragement, imitation, pressure and resource provision | Moderate all other condition interactions: support and positive norms amplify facilitators and reduce resistance; economic incentives reinforce sustained use; proxy reliance, negative norms and stereotypes weaken positive effects | Supportive norms/support → active use; proxy reliance/stereotypes → limited/non-use | |
| Positive experiences build confidence and promote peer diffusion; negative experiences reduce motivation and engagement | Feedback alter user readiness (confidence, skills), technology perceptions (trust, usability) and social environment (peer views), reshaping subsequent interactions | Positive feedback → sustain/expand use; negative feedback → withdraw/avoid |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.