Table 5

Comparison of MBRT–CRRA and LSM–CRRA to value a Bermudan Put γ vs T

T//gamma−0.9−0.500.50.9
minmeanmaxminmeanmaxminmeanmaxminmeanmaxminmeanmax
1//12 0.360*  0.300*  0.21*  0.10*  0.00* 
0.3540.3630.3730.2940.3040.3150.2060.2150.2220.1040.110.1170.0040.0050.005
1//6 0.490*  0.40*  0.290*  0.14*  0.005* 
0.4790.4950.5140.3980.4120.430.2790.2950.3070.1420.1490.1580.0040.0060.008
1//4 0.582*  0.486*  0.34*  0.17*  0.006* 
0.5670.5890.6080.4750.4920.5090.3380.3510.3650.1650.1770.1860.0060.0070.009
1//3 0.655*  0.548*  0.39*  0.199*  0.007* 
0.640.6620.6820.5380.5560.5810.3810.3960.4110.1890.20.2130.0050.0070.009
1//2 0.768*  0.64*  0.463*  0.234*  0.007* 
0.750.7750.7990.630.6530.6710.4420.4650.480.2170.2360.2540.0060.0080.01
1 0.982*  0.829*  0.601*  0.302*  0.008* 
0.9560.9931.0270.8020.8390.8750.5790.6050.6320.2860.3020.3190.0070.0090.011
2 1.202*  1.026*  0.750*  0.371*  0.008* 
1.1711.2081.2411.0061.0361.0690.7230.7540.7990.3510.3730.3960.0070.0090.011

Note(s): In each expiration scenario, the first row displays the MBRT–CRRA premium (*), while the second row presents the minimum, mean and maximum values of the LSM–CRRA method for 50 repetitions

Source(s): Authors’ own elaboration

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options