Table 3

Ports according to their business continuity in ascending order

Port companyTurnover decline + recoveryOwnershipSizePrimary line of businessSpecializationFreight directionFreight main type
Helsinki−27%PublicLargePassenger and FreightMulti-purposeBi-directionalUnitized
Hanko−21%PublicLargeFreightMulti-purposeBi-directionalUnitized
Oulu−21%PublicMediumFreightSingle-purposeBi-directionalBoth
Kalajoki−14%PublicSmallFreightMulti-purposeExportBulk
Uusi-Kaupunki−14%PublicSmallFreightMulti-purposeBi-directionalBoth
Kemi−10%PublicMediumFreightSingle-purposeExportBulk
Hamina-Kotka−14%PublicLargeFreightMulti-purposeExportBoth
Tolkkinen−8%PrivateSmallFreightMulti-purposeBi-directionalBulk
Turku−7%PublicLargePassenger and FreightMulti-purposeBi-directionalUnitized
Pori−4%PublicMediumFreightMulti-purposeBi-directionalBulk
Rauma−3%PublicMediumFreightMulti-purposeExportBoth
Inkoo−3%PrivateLargeFreightSingle-purposeBi-directionalBulk
Kokkola−1%PublicLargeFreightMulti-purposeExportBoth
Pietarsaari8%PublicSmallFreightSingle-purposeExportBulk
Vaasa11%PublicSmallPassenger and FreightMulti-purposeImportBulk
Kaskinen17%PublicSmallFreightSingle-purposeBi-directionalBulk
Naantali19%PublicMediumPassenger and FreightMulti-purposeImportBoth
Raahe28%PublicMediumFreightSingle-purposeImportBulk
Source(s): Table created by authors

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal