Table 4

Summary of mediation effects using different methods

EstimateStatistical inference
Std. ErrorTest statp-value95% CI
System GMM (Sobel test)
Path a: OE(t−1) → ESG(t)2.618*1.172.2360.025[0.323, 4.912]
Path b: ESG(t−1) → ROA(t)0.046**0.0162.8470.004[0.014, 0.077]
Path c: OE(t−2) → ROA(t)1.098**0.4212.6110.009[0.274, 1.923]
Path c′: OE(t−2) → ROA(t) | ESG(t−1)0.808*0.42.0180.044[0.023, 1.593]
Indirect Effect: a × b0.1190.0681.7590.079[–0.014, 0.252]
Monte Carlo Simulation (10,000 draws)
Path a: OE(t−1) → ESG(t)2.6176*1.1705 0.025[0.323, 4.911]
Path b: ESG(t−1) → ROA(t)0.0455**0.0160 0.004[0.014, 0.076]
Indirect Effect0.119*0.071 0.033[0.007, 0.281]
Firm Cluster Bootstrap (500 replications)
Indirect Effect0.124**0.06 0.008[0.026, 0.253]
SEM: OE(t−1) → ESG(t → ROA(t+1)
Indirect Effect (clustered by firm)0.047***0.0123.807<0.001[0.023, 0.072]
Indirect Effect (clustered by year)0.047***0.0095.237<0.001[0.030, 0.065]
OLS: OE(t-2) → ESG(t-1) → ROA(t)
ACME (Indirect)0.080***0.0089.931<0.001[0.064, 0.096]
ADE (Direct)0.100***0.0195.413<0.001[0.064, 0.136]
Total Effect0.180***0.01710.358<0.001[0.146, 0.214]

Note(s): *, **, *** denote p < 0.1, 0.05, 0.01, 0.001 respectively

GMM includes firm and time fixed effects

Test Stat. Column contains z-values from GMM robust estimates and the Sobel z-value for the indirect effect

SEM uses bootstrap CIs

SEM Model Fit: RMSEA = 0.066, CFI = 0.928, SRMR = 0.015

OLS uses OE(t-2) → ESG(t-1) → ROA(t) with year controls

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options