Comparison between final project ROI, company WACC and projects correctly classified by MPL algorithm. The ROI value is higher than the company’s WACC from project 13 on
| Code | Project type | ROI | ROI class | MLP class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | Lean manufacturing optimization | 3,2 | Very low | ✓ |
| P2 | Six sigma quality improvement | 3,7 | Very low | |
| P3 | Lean supply chain enhancement | 3,9 | Very low | ✓ |
| P4 | Lean process streamlining | 3,9 | Very low | ✓ |
| P5 | Six sigma defect reduction | 4,0 | Very low | |
| P6 | Lean workflow efficiency | 5,2 | Low | ✓ |
| P7 | Six sigma cycle time reduction | 5,6 | Low | ✓ |
| P8 | Lean inventory management | 6,3 | Low | ✓ |
| P9 | Six sigma cost reduction | 7,1 | Low | ✓ |
| P10 | Lean product development | 7,4 | Low | ✓ |
| P11 | Six sigma compliance alignment | 8,0 | Medium | |
| P12 | Lean waste minimization | 8,3 | Medium | ✓ |
| P13 | Six sigma process control | 8,9 | Medium | ✓ |
| P14 | Lean just-in-time implementation | 8,9 | Medium | ✓ |
| P15 | Six sigma variability reduction | 9,5 | Medium | |
| P16 | Lean safety improvement | 9,9 | High | ✓ |
| P17 | Six sigma supplier management | 10,2 | High | ✓ |
| P18 | Lean production scaling | 10,4 | High | ✓ |
| P19 | Six sigmas products optimizations | 10,7 | High | |
| P20 | Lean continuous flow | 11,4 | High | ✓ |
| P21 | Six sigma data analysis | 11,7 | High | ✓ |
| P22 | Lean quality systems | 12,0 | High | |
| P23 | Six sigma strategic planning | 13,2 | High | ✓ |
| P24 | Lean energy efficiency | 13,3 | High | |
| P25 | Six sigma automation projects | 14,5 | Very high | |
| P26 | Lean sustainable practices | 15,0 | Very high | |
| P27 | Six sigma advanced analytics | 15,3 | Very high | |
| P28 | Lean production optimization | 16,2 | Very high | ✓ |
| Code | Project type | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | Lean manufacturing optimization | 3,2 | Very low | ✓ |
| P2 | Six sigma quality improvement | 3,7 | Very low | |
| P3 | Lean supply chain enhancement | 3,9 | Very low | ✓ |
| P4 | Lean process streamlining | 3,9 | Very low | ✓ |
| P5 | Six sigma defect reduction | 4,0 | Very low | |
| P6 | Lean workflow efficiency | 5,2 | Low | ✓ |
| P7 | Six sigma cycle time reduction | 5,6 | Low | ✓ |
| P8 | Lean inventory management | 6,3 | Low | ✓ |
| P9 | Six sigma cost reduction | 7,1 | Low | ✓ |
| P10 | Lean product development | 7,4 | Low | ✓ |
| P11 | Six sigma compliance alignment | 8,0 | Medium | |
| P12 | Lean waste minimization | 8,3 | Medium | ✓ |
| P13 | Six sigma process control | 8,9 | Medium | ✓ |
| P14 | Lean just-in-time implementation | 8,9 | Medium | ✓ |
| P15 | Six sigma variability reduction | 9,5 | Medium | |
| P16 | Lean safety improvement | 9,9 | High | ✓ |
| P17 | Six sigma supplier management | 10,2 | High | ✓ |
| P18 | Lean production scaling | 10,4 | High | ✓ |
| P19 | Six sigmas products optimizations | 10,7 | High | |
| P20 | Lean continuous flow | 11,4 | High | ✓ |
| P21 | Six sigma data analysis | 11,7 | High | ✓ |
| P22 | Lean quality systems | 12,0 | High | |
| P23 | Six sigma strategic planning | 13,2 | High | ✓ |
| P24 | Lean energy efficiency | 13,3 | High | |
| P25 | Six sigma automation projects | 14,5 | Very high | |
| P26 | Lean sustainable practices | 15,0 | Very high | |
| P27 | Six sigma advanced analytics | 15,3 | Very high | |
| P28 | Lean production optimization | 16,2 | Very high | ✓ |
The check mark (✓) in the “MLP class” column indicates that the project has been correctly classified by the Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) algorithm
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.