Table 4 Results from structural model (... | Emerald Publishing

Table 4

Results from structural model (N = 52)

Relationship	Path coefficient	SE	P-value (2-sided)	CI95	Cohen’s effect size
IL → TBM (H1)	0.38**	0.15	0.01	0.10, 0.66	0.16
TBM → OUP (H2)	0.63***	0.11	0.00	0.36, 0.80	0.67
TBM → TI (H3)	−0.56***	0.13	0.00	−0.77, −0.29	0.45
TBM → OCB (H4)	0.61	0.11	0.00	0.29, 0.80	0.59
Sector → TBM	0.11	0.17	0.50	−0.21, 0.45	0.01
Unit size → TBM	−0.11	0.17	0.51	−0.47, 0.19	0.01
Global model fit	Value	HI95
SRMR	0.10	0.14
Eucledian distance (d_ULS)	1.78	3.13
Geodesic distance (d_G)	1.31	2.66
Measurement model fit	R²	Adjusted R²
TBM	0.18	0.13
OUP	0.40	0.39
TI	0.31	0.29
OCB	0.37	0.36

Relationship	Path coefficient	SE	P-value (2-sided)	CI95	Cohen’s effect size
IL → TBM (H1)	0.38**	0.15	0.01	0.10, 0.66	0.16
TBM → OUP (H2)	0.63***	0.11	0.00	0.36, 0.80	0.67
TBM → TI (H3)	−0.56***	0.13	0.00	−0.77, −0.29	0.45
TBM → OCB (H4)	0.61	0.11	0.00	0.29, 0.80	0.59
Sector → TBM	0.11	0.17	0.50	−0.21, 0.45	0.01
Unit size → TBM	−0.11	0.17	0.51	−0.47, 0.19	0.01
Global model fit	Value	HI95
SRMR	0.10	0.14
Eucledian distance (d_ULS)	1.78	3.13
Geodesic distance (d_G)	1.31	2.66
Measurement model fit	R²	Adjusted R²
TBM	0.18	0.13
OUP	0.40	0.39
TI	0.31	0.29
OCB	0.37	0.36

Note(s): **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. SRMRs = Standardized Root Mean Squared Residuals. PLS-PM estimation with 300 iterations and 5,000 bootstrap samples

Source(s): Author’s own work