Table 5. Structural model results... | Emerald Publishing

Table 5.

Structural model results

Hypothesis	Path coefficients		SD		t-value (bootstrap)		p-values		Confidence interval [2.5%; 97.5%]
Direct relationship analysis
H1: NC → GCVs	0.162		0.049		3.271		0.001		[0.070; 0.261]
H2: RP → GCVs	0.670		0.054		12.437		0.000		[0.553;0.765]
H3: GCVs → BT (without mediator)	0.439		0.083		5.272		0.000		[0.258; 0.584]
R²BL = 0.442	Q²BL = 0.401
R²BT = 0.357	Q²BT = 0.308
R² GCVs = 0.582	Q² GCVs = 0.572

Hypothesis	Path coefficients		SD		t-value (bootstrap)		p-values		Confidence interval [2.5%; 97.5%]
Direct relationship analysis
H1: NC → GCVs	0.162		0.049		3.271		0.001		[0.070; 0.261]
H2: RP → GCVs	0.670		0.054		12.437		0.000		[0.553;0.765]
H3: GCVs → BT (without mediator)	0.439		0.083		5.272		0.000		[0.258; 0.584]
R²BL = 0.442	Q²BL = 0.401
R²BT = 0.357	Q²BT = 0.308
R² GCVs = 0.582	Q² GCVs = 0.572

Mediation analysis
Total effect (GCVs → BT)		Direct effect (GCVs → BT) (with mediator)		Indirect effects of GCVs on BT
Coefficient	p-value	Coefficient	p-value		Coefficient	SD	t-value (bootstrap)	p-values	Confidence interval [2.5%; 97.5%]
0.125	0.205	0.021	0.846	H4: GCVs → BL → BT	0.104	0.045	2.326	0.020	[0.033; 0.213]


Moderation analysis	Path coefficient		SD		t-value (bootstrap)		p-values		Confidence interval [2.5%; 97.5%]
H5:AP x GCVs → BL	−0.108		0.039		2.76		0.006		[−0.189; −0.036]
H6:AP x BL → BT	−0.134		0.047		2.824		0.005		[−0.237; −0.048]