Results of confirmatory factor analysis
| Model | χ2 (d.f.) | χ2/d.f | RMSEA | SRMR | CFI | TLI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Four-factor model | 396.18 (246) | 1.61 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.94 | 0.94 |
| Six-factor model Including Autonomy, Relatedness and Competence | 736.44 (480) | 1.53 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.93 | 0.92 |
| Three-factor model Psychological need satisfaction and well-being were blended | 542.00 (249) | 2.18 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.89 | 0.88 |
| One-factor model | 1521.51 (252) | 6.04 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.52 | 0.47 |
| Model | RMSEA | SRMR | CFI | TLI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Four-factor model | 396.18 (246) | 1.61 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.94 | 0.94 |
| Six-factor model | 736.44 (480) | 1.53 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.93 | 0.92 |
| Three-factor model | 542.00 (249) | 2.18 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.89 | 0.88 |
| One-factor model | 1521.51 (252) | 6.04 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.52 | 0.47 |
Note(s): N = 282. d.f. = degree of freedom; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; SRMR = standardized root mean square residual; CFI = comparative fit index and TLI = Tucker–Lewis index
Source(s): Authors’ own work
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.