Contribution relative to prior research
| Paper | Empirical setting | Key findings | Moderating variables |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lyles and Baird (1994) | 60 foreign IJVs operating in Hungary and Poland | The conflict has no effect on IJV performance | No |
| Cullen et al. (1995) | 89 Japanese IJVs operating in foreign countries | The conflict has a negative effect on IJV performance | No |
| Fey and Beamish (1999) | 40 foreign IJVs operating in Russia | The conflict has a positive effect on IJV performance | No |
| Ding (1997) | 34 IJVs of US firms operating in China | The conflict has a negative effect on IJV performance | No |
| Demirbag and Mirza (2000) | 47 foreign IJVs operating in Turkey | The conflict has a negative effect on IJV performance | No |
| Fey and Beamish (2000) | 40 foreign IJVs operating in Russia | The conflict has a negative effect on IJV performance | No |
| Kemp and Ghauri (2001) | 78 IJVs operating in Netherland | The conflict has no effect on IJV performance | No |
| Steensma and Lyles (2000) | 121 IJVs of European and US firms operating in Hungary | The conflict has a negative effect on IJV performance | No |
| Kauser and Shaw (2004) | 114 ISAs (ICAs and IJVs) of British firms with partners from USA, EU and Japan | The conflict has a negative effect on IJV performance | No |
| Pak et al. (2009) | 100 foreign IJVs operating in Korea | The conflict has no effect on IJV performance | No |
| Westman and Thorgren (2016) | Swedish IJV operating in East European country | The conflict has a negative effect on IJV performance | No |
| Tetteh et al. (2023b) | 53 foreign IJVs operating in Ghana | The conflict has a negative effect on IJV performance | No |
| Present study | 89 IJVs of Nordic firms operating in foreign countries | The conflict has a positive effect on IJV performance while using problem-solving strategy, no effect while using compromising strategy and negative impact while using forcing strategy | Conflict resolution strategies (problem-solving, compromising and forcing) |
| Paper | Empirical setting | Key findings | Moderating variables |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60 foreign IJVs operating in Hungary and Poland | The conflict has no effect on | No | |
| 89 Japanese IJVs operating in foreign countries | The conflict has a negative effect on | No | |
| 40 foreign IJVs operating in Russia | The conflict has a positive effect on | No | |
| 34 IJVs of | The conflict has a negative effect on | No | |
| 47 foreign IJVs operating in Turkey | The conflict has a negative effect on | No | |
| 40 foreign IJVs operating in Russia | The conflict has a negative effect on | No | |
| 78 IJVs operating in Netherland | The conflict has no effect on | No | |
| 121 IJVs of European and | The conflict has a negative effect on | No | |
| 114 ISAs (ICAs and IJVs) of British firms with partners from USA, | The conflict has a negative effect on | No | |
| 100 foreign IJVs operating in Korea | The conflict has no effect on | No | |
| Swedish | The conflict has a negative effect on | No | |
| 53 foreign IJVs operating in Ghana | The conflict has a negative effect on | No | |
| Present study | 89 IJVs of Nordic firms operating in foreign countries | The conflict has a positive effect on | Conflict resolution strategies (problem-solving, compromising and forcing) |
ISAs = international strategic alliances; ICAs = international cooperative alliances
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.