Table 3 fsQCA results for network... | Emerald Publishing

Table 3

fsQCA results for network configurations

Panel A: Analysis of necessary
Conditions	Technology Adoption Success
Conditions	Consistency	Coverage
High Network Centrality	0.82	0.78
High Tie Strength Diversity	0.79	0.75
High Absorptive Capacity	0.84	0.81
Low Institutional Voids	0.76	0.73
∼High Network Centrality	0.45	0.42
∼High Tie Strength Diversity	0.48	0.45
∼High Absorptive Capacity	0.41	0.38
∼Low Institutional Voids	0.52	0.49
Note(s): ∼ indicates absence of condition

Panel A: Analysis of necessary
Conditions	Technology Adoption Success
Conditions	Consistency	Coverage
High Network Centrality	0.82	0.78
High Tie Strength Diversity	0.79	0.75
High Absorptive Capacity	0.84	0.81
Low Institutional Voids	0.76	0.73
∼High Network Centrality	0.45	0.42
∼High Tie Strength Diversity	0.48	0.45
∼High Absorptive Capacity	0.41	0.38
∼Low Institutional Voids	0.52	0.49
Note(s): ∼ indicates absence of condition

Panel B: Sufficient Configurations for high technology adoption
Configuration Elements	Solution
Configuration Elements	1	2	3	4	5
Network Centrality	●	●	●	○	●
Tie Strength Diversity	●	●	○	●	●
Absorptive Capacity	●	●	●	●	○
Low Institutional Voids	●	○	●	●	○
Firm Size (large)	○	●	●	○	●

Raw Coverage	0.35	0.32	0.28	0.26	0.24
Unique Coverage	0.15	0.12	0.09	0.08	0.07
Consistency	0.89	0.87	0.86	0.85	0.84
Solution Coverage: 0.72
Solution Consistency: 0.86

Panel B: Sufficient Configurations for high technology adoption
Configuration Elements	Solution
Configuration Elements	1	2	3	4	5
Network Centrality	●	●	●	○	●
Tie Strength Diversity	●	●	○	●	●
Absorptive Capacity	●	●	●	●	○
Low Institutional Voids	●	○	●	●	○
Firm Size (large)	○	●	●	○	●

Raw Coverage	0.35	0.32	0.28	0.26	0.24
Unique Coverage	0.15	0.12	0.09	0.08	0.07
Consistency	0.89	0.87	0.86	0.85	0.84
Solution Coverage: 0.72
Solution Consistency: 0.86

Note(s): ● = presence of condition; ○ = absence of condition