Table 17

Hypotheses testing summary

HHypothesized relationTest/ModelKey result (estimate, 95% CI)Model fit/ΔR2Decision
H1WIL → CSE (+)Linear regressionβ = 0.44, b = 0.44, t = 10.58, p < 0.001, 95% CI [0.36, 0.52]R2 = 0.19Supported
H2CSE → CAD (+)Linear regressionβ = 0.59, b = 0.51, t = 16.01, p < 0.001, 95% CI [0.45, 0.58]R2 = 0.35Supported
H3CAD → EMP (+)Simple regressionβ = 0.73, b = 0.73, t = 23.30, p < 0.001, 95% CI [0.67, 0.79]R2 = 0.53Supported
H4WIL → CSE → CADPROCESS Model 4 (mediation)Indirect (a × b) = 0.21, Boot 95% CI [0.16, 0.26]; Direct c′ = 0.09, p = 0.018R2: total 0.12 → with M 0.36Supported (partial mediation)
H5WIL → CSE → CAD → EMPPROCESS Model 6 (serial mediation)Serial Ind3 = 0.15, Boot 95% CI [0.12, 0.19]; Total indirect = 0.23 [0.17, 0.29]; c′ = −0.01, p = 0.718R2 (EMP with mediators) = 0.53Supported (full mediation overall)
H6PRO × (WIL → CSE)PROCESS Model 1 (moderation)Interaction b = 0.20, p < 0.001; simple slopes at PRO: low = 0.18 (p = 0.002), median = 0.44 (p < 0.001), high = 0.69 (p < 0.001); J–N: PRO >1.42ΔR2 = 0.05Supported
Source(s): Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal