Table 1

Comparative context frameworks summary table

ToolEpistemological foundationConceptual structureMethodological guidanceEmpirical useRelevance to integrated care
Context Coding Framework (Rogers et al., 2020)ConstructivistInductive, multi-domainStructured coding guideModerateHigh
CFIR (Damschroder et al., 2022)Post-positivistStructured domainsExtensive toolsHighModerate
TDF (Cane et al., 2012)Post-positivistBehavioural constructsValidated instrumentsHighModerate
i-PARIHS (Harvey and Kitson, 2015)PragmatistMid-range theoryFacilitation-focused guidanceHighModerate
Realist Evaluation/CMO (Pawson et al., 2005)Critical realistCMO configurationsTheory-building heuristicsHighHigh
NASSS (Greenhalgh et al., 2017)Critical realistSeven dynamic domainsHeuristics, flexibleModerateHigh
CICI (Pfadenhauer et al., 2017)ConstructivistMulti-level domainsConceptual clarity, less proceduralModerateHigh
ICON (Squires et al., 2023)ConstructivistNested multi-domain meta-frameworkDetailed procedural guideModerateHigh
BANANA (Mielke et al., 2022)PragmatistSix clustersDecision support for early scopingEmergingModerate
CCIC (Suter et al., 2017)PragmatistOrganisational domainsModerate guidanceLowModerate
CAPA (Barry, 2021)ParticipatoryFlexible, iterative inquiryMinimal procedural detailLowHigh
Svensson’s Contextual Analysis (Svensson, 2021)ParticipatoryGuided inquiry modelRelational process guidanceLowHigh
Shani and Pasmore’s Action Research Theory (Shani and Pasmore, 1982)Pragmatist/ParticipatoryContext-content-processCollaborative, reflexiveLowModerate

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal