Table 2

Constructs, items, and measurement sources

ConstructItems (statements)Sources
Social Media Engagement (SME)SME1: I frequently interact (like, share, comment) with pedestrian safety content on social mediaDessart et al. (2016), Dolan et al. (2019) 
SME2: Social media posts about road safety attract my attention
SME3: I regularly follow pedestrian safety campaigns on social media
SME4: Social media discussions influence how I think about using pedestrian bridges
SME5: I feel more motivated to use pedestrian bridges when I see safety messages online
Community Enforcement Visibility (CEV)CEV1: I often see enforcement officers monitoring pedestrian crossingsSozer and Merlo (2013) 
CEV2: Visible community policing or wardens encourage me to use pedestrian bridges
CEV3: There are signs or warnings about penalties for unsafe road crossing
CEV4: The presence of enforcement increases my likelihood of using a bridge. CEV5: I believe enforcement officers are active in ensuring pedestrians use bridges
Pedestrian Bridge Utilisation (PBU)PBU1: I frequently use pedestrian bridges when they are availableHasan et al. (2020), Räsänen et al. (2007) 
PBU2: I prefer pedestrian bridges even if they require extra walking
PBU3: I choose pedestrian bridges over crossing the road directly
PBU4: I encourage others to use pedestrian bridges instead of unsafe crossings
PBU5: I consider pedestrian bridges as the safest way to cross roads
Anticipated Risk (AR)AR1: I believe crossing the road without a bridge is very riskyJiang et al. (2023) 
AR2: I think there is a high chance of accidents if I don't use pedestrian bridges. AR3: Ignoring pedestrian bridges increases the likelihood of serious injury

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal