Table 1 Comparisons of proposed and...

Table 1

Comparisons of proposed and alternative models

Models	χ²	Df	CFI	SRMR	RMSEA	Models	Δ χ²	Δdf
1. Proposed six-factor model (POS + PJ + WE + JS + BO + TP)	679.23*	361	0.91	0.06	0.06	–	–	–
2. Five-factor model (POS and PJ + WE + JS + BO + TP)	1236.26*	367	0.76	0.08	0.10	2 vs. 1	557.03***	6
3. Three-factor model (POS and PJ + WE + JS, BO, and TP)	1511.37*	374	0.68	0.11	0.12	3 vs. 1	832.14***	13
4. One-factor model (All items combined)	2349.85*	377	0.46	0.14	0.15	4 vs. 1	1670.85***	16

Models	χ²	Df	CFI	SRMR	RMSEA	Models	Δ χ²	Δdf
1. Proposed six-factor model (POS + PJ + WE + JS + BO + TP)	679.23*	361	0.91	0.06	0.06	–	–	–
2. Five-factor model (POS and PJ + WE + JS + BO + TP)	1236.26*	367	0.76	0.08	0.10	2 vs. 1	557.03***	6
3. Three-factor model (POS and PJ + WE + JS, BO, and TP)	1511.37*	374	0.68	0.11	0.12	3 vs. 1	832.14***	13
4. One-factor model (All items combined)	2349.85*	377	0.46	0.14	0.15	4 vs. 1	1670.85***	16

Note(s): ***p < 0.001. POS = Perceived organizational support; PJ = Person–job fit; WE = Work engagement; JS = Job satisfaction; BO = Burnout; TP = Task performance; df = degree of freedom; CFI = Comparative fit index; SRMR = Standardized root mean squared residual; RMSEA = Root mean square error of approximation

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable