Correlation matrix and validity assessment
| Correlations/HTMT | EP | FP | EMCS | Technical integration | Management integration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model variables | |||||
| EP | 0.063 | NA | 0.139 | 0.194 | |
| FP | 0.010 | NA | 0.107 | 0.183 | |
| EMCS | 0.276*** | 0.032 | NA | NA | |
| Technical integration | 0.101 | 0.089 | 0.166 | 0.773 | |
| Management integration | 0.214* | 0.201** | 0.205** | 0.610*** | |
| Correlations/HTMT | Technical integration | Management integration | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.063 | 0.139 | 0.194 | |||
| 0.010 | 0.107 | 0.183 | |||
| 0.276 | 0.032 | ||||
| Technical integration | 0.101 | 0.089 | 0.166 | 0.773 | |
| Management integration | 0.214* | 0.201** | 0.205** | 0.610 | |
Sample size n = 112. Lower off-diagonal elements are bivariate Bravais–Pearson correlation coefficients of the latent variable scores. Upper off-diagonal elements are estimates of the correlation between two reflective constructs (HTMT), which are not indicated for formative constructs. *, ** and *** indicate significance at the 0.1, 0.05 and 0.01 levels (two-tailed), respectively. EP = eco-performance; EMCS = environmental management control system; FP = financial performance; HTMT = heterotrait–monotrait ratio of correlations
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.