Table A1.

Information about the variables

VariablesDescription
NNumber of participants
RoMM_ASMTRisk of material misstatement, on a scale from 1 to 100
Risk factorsNumber of risk factors reported by participants
Control factorsNumber of control factors reported by participants
Time useTime (in seconds) participants used to read the case as and assess the RoMM, as well as to answer the open-ended questions regarding risk factors
ConfidenceConfidence in RoMM estimate, on a scale from 1 (Not Certain) to 10 (Very Certain)
Information-processingManipulation for intuitive versus deliberative processing
PresentationManipulation for linguistic versus visual presentation format
GenderGender of participants (0 = male and 1 = female)
ExperienceYears of experience
HPSSMean score of the 30-item Hurtt (2010) Professional Skepticism Scale
PID_IMean score of the intuitive scale of the Preference for Intuition and Deliberation scale (C. Betsch, 2004, 2008a)
PID_DMean score of the deliberative scale of the Preference for Intuition and Deliberation scale (C. Betsch, 2004, 2008a)
ComplexityPerceived complexity, on a scale from 1 (simple) to 10 (complex)
RealisticPerceived realism of the case, on a scale from 1 (not realistic) to 10 (realistic)
AbilityPerceived competency to carry out the task, on a scale from 1 (insufficiently skilled) to 10 (sufficiently skilled)
I-VISIntuitive – visual condition
D-VISDeliberative – visual condition
I-LINIntuitive – linguistic condition
D-LINDeliberative – linguistic condition

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options