Table 10.

Family control, political connections and CSRD – entropy balancing

VariablesBefore entropy balancingAfter entropy balancing
TreatControlTreatControl
MeanVarianceMeanVarianceMeanVarianceMeanVariance
Panel A: Sample descriptive statistics before and after entropy balancing
FC0.6060.2390.4240.2450.6060.2390.6050.239
PC0.2890.2060.1950.1580.2890.2060.2890.206
FSIZE22.1701.88721.6502.47622.1701.88722.1701.892
ROA0.0550.0030.0490.0040.0550.0030.0550.003
LEV0.4290.0490.4690.0620.4290.0490.4300.049
CAPIN0.4410.0580.3970.0600.4410.0580.4410.058
CASHH0.0740.0100.0640.0080.0740.0100.0740.010
KZ0.85357.9001.48667.5600.85357.9000.85557.920
AGE3.2240.2463.3640.1923.2240.2463.2250.245
BOARD7.5743.8997.2903.6917.5743.8997.5743.899
INDBM1.8950.3921.7830.3411.8950.3921.8950.392
FBM1.1961.2191.1860.9421.1961.2191.1961.219
 (1)(2)
 CSRDCSRD
Panel B: Regressions using entropy-balanced sample
FC−6.040*** (1.258)
PC−3.605*** (1.352)
AUDIT0.024 (0.279)0.007 (0.296)
FC × AUDIT1.643*** (0.318)
PC × AUDIT0.815*** (0.290)
Observations11081108
Adjusted R20.3810.345
Note(s):

This table reports the results of the regression of family control, political connections and the moderating role of audit committees on CSR disclosure using PSM analysis. Firms with audit committee size above the cross-sectional median are classified as the treatment group, while those below the median form the control group. Panel A displays the mean and variance of the control variables for both groups, before and after applying entropy balancing. Panel B reports the regression results using the entropy-balanced sample. Detailed definitions of variables are provided in  Appendix 1 Table A1. All regressions controlled for industry and time fixed effects. The standard errors are reported in parentheses. ***, ** and * denote significance at the 1, 5 and 10% levels, respectively

Source(s): Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal