Summary of key findings
| Bibliometric analysis key findings | |
|---|---|
| Country Analysis |
|
| Keyword Analysis |
|
| Bibliometric analysis key findings | |
|---|---|
| Country Analysis | Spain and the US lead in publication production. However, most publications come from the Asia continent Spanish publications emphasize improving operational performance in the service sector US publications emphasize improving operational performance in the manufacturing sector |
| Keyword Analysis | TQM and operational performance are the dominant research areas Based on the keyword analysis and clusters formed, QM seems to be linked to performance improvement across various sectors Some QM practices are unique to developing countries, showing a positive impact on operational performance QM is consistently linked to improvements in operational, sustainable, and financial performance |
| Systematic review key findings | ||
|---|---|---|
| Key QM Tools Discussed | Total Quality Management (TQM), Total Productive Maintenance (TPM), Just-in-Time (JIT), Lean, Six Sigma, Lean Six Sigma (LSS), and Industry 4.0 integration | |
| Top Performance Metrics | Manufacturing Sector | Quality, time, productivity, time-to-delivery, innovation, and manufacturer responsiveness |
| Service Sector | Customer satisfaction, customer acquisition, time of service, service quality, and process effectiveness | |
| Observed Theme | QM practices generally positively impact operational performance in manufacturing and service industries, enhancing quality, customer satisfaction, inventory management, process efficiency, and innovation. Further details are provided in Table 1. However, it is still unclear to practitioners and decision-makers what QM initiative to adopt in response to a certain challenge or to achieve a certain quality goal | |
| Implications for Future Research | This study guides practitioners and decision-makers interested in employing QM techniques to enhance operational performance. It suggests exploring the impact of Q4.0 on operational performance and the need for empirical studies comparing previous tools with Q4.0 | |
| Systematic review key findings | ||
|---|---|---|
| Key QM Tools Discussed | Total Quality Management (TQM), Total Productive Maintenance (TPM), Just-in-Time (JIT), Lean, Six Sigma, Lean Six Sigma (LSS), and Industry 4.0 integration | |
| Top Performance Metrics | Manufacturing Sector | Quality, time, productivity, time-to-delivery, innovation, and manufacturer responsiveness |
| Service Sector | Customer satisfaction, customer acquisition, time of service, service quality, and process effectiveness | |
| Observed Theme | QM practices generally positively impact operational performance in manufacturing and service industries, enhancing quality, customer satisfaction, inventory management, process efficiency, and innovation. Further details are provided in | |
| Implications for Future Research | This study guides practitioners and decision-makers interested in employing QM techniques to enhance operational performance. It suggests exploring the impact of Q4.0 on operational performance and the need for empirical studies comparing previous tools with Q4.0 | |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.