Comprehensive synthesis of WE literature
| Study | Region | Building type/scale | Primary focus | Key findings | Identified limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rodrigues et al. (2020) | Portugal (EU) | Building scale | Water–energy nexus | Water reduction and building energy reduction; additional energy savings in urban water systems | Relies on voluntary audits; limited evidence of large-scale replication |
| Greer et al. (2019) | USA | Building a certification system | WE and EE credits in LEED | Large variability in avoided CO2 per WE/EE credit; weak correlation between credits and actual environmental outcomes | Point-based certification poorly reflects real performance |
| Mohd Zaini, Kwong and Jack (2021) | Malaysia | Commercial buildings | Water efficiency retrofits | Water savings achievable via efficient fittings; acceptable payback periods | Case-study scope: outcomes dependent on building type and usage |
| Luo, Scofield and Qiu (2021) | USA (multi-city) | Commercial buildings | LEED water performance | No statistically significant difference in water use between LEED and non-LEED buildings | Certification does not account for operational and behavioural factors |
| Bint (2012) | New Zealand | Commercial buildings | Rainwater harvesting and greywater reuse | Systems are technically feasible; financial viability depends on volumetric water and wastewater charging; water quality risks are minimal | Network-level water savings are limited; outcomes are sensitive to tariff structures |
| Bint et al. (2019) | New Zealand | Urban scale | Water demand management | Improved metering and awareness of water use | Uneven adoption across councils; limited linkage to building-scale action |
| Challies, Fragaszy and Rouillard (2022) | New Zealand | National policy level | Freshwater governance | Water abundance framing obscures over-allocation and inefficiency | Efficiency is weakly prioritised within an allocation-focused regime |
| Study | Region | Building type/scale | Primary focus | Key findings | Identified limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portugal ( | Building scale | Water–energy nexus | Water reduction and building energy reduction; additional energy savings in urban water systems | Relies on voluntary audits; limited evidence of large-scale replication | |
| Building a certification system | Large variability in avoided CO2 per WE/EE credit; weak correlation between credits and actual environmental outcomes | Point-based certification poorly reflects real performance | |||
| Malaysia | Commercial buildings | Water efficiency retrofits | Water savings achievable via efficient fittings; acceptable payback periods | Case-study scope: outcomes dependent on building type and usage | |
| Commercial buildings | No statistically significant difference in water use between | Certification does not account for operational and behavioural factors | |||
| New Zealand | Commercial buildings | Rainwater harvesting and greywater reuse | Systems are technically feasible; financial viability depends on volumetric water and wastewater charging; water quality risks are minimal | Network-level water savings are limited; outcomes are sensitive to tariff structures | |
| New Zealand | Urban scale | Water demand management | Improved metering and awareness of water use | Uneven adoption across councils; limited linkage to building-scale action | |
| New Zealand | National policy level | Freshwater governance | Water abundance framing obscures over-allocation and inefficiency | Efficiency is weakly prioritised within an allocation-focused regime |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.