Table 3.

Comprehensive synthesis of WE literature

StudyRegionBuilding type/scalePrimary focusKey findingsIdentified limitations
Rodrigues et al. (2020) Portugal (EU)Building scaleWater–energy nexusWater reduction and building energy reduction; additional energy savings in urban water systemsRelies on voluntary audits; limited evidence of large-scale replication
Greer et al. (2019) USABuilding a certification systemWE and EE credits in LEEDLarge variability in avoided CO2 per WE/EE credit; weak correlation between credits and actual environmental outcomesPoint-based certification poorly reflects real performance
Mohd Zaini, Kwong and Jack (2021) MalaysiaCommercial buildingsWater efficiency retrofitsWater savings achievable via efficient fittings; acceptable payback periodsCase-study scope: outcomes dependent on building type and usage
Luo, Scofield and Qiu (2021) USA (multi-city)Commercial buildingsLEED water performanceNo statistically significant difference in water use between LEED and non-LEED buildingsCertification does not account for operational and behavioural factors
Bint (2012) New ZealandCommercial buildingsRainwater harvesting and greywater reuseSystems are technically feasible; financial viability depends on volumetric water and wastewater charging; water quality risks are minimalNetwork-level water savings are limited; outcomes are sensitive to tariff structures
Bint et al. (2019) New ZealandUrban scaleWater demand managementImproved metering and awareness of water useUneven adoption across councils; limited linkage to building-scale action
Challies, Fragaszy and Rouillard (2022) New ZealandNational policy levelFreshwater governanceWater abundance framing obscures over-allocation and inefficiencyEfficiency is weakly prioritised within an allocation-focused regime

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal