Table 3

Summary of the main findings during the compression loading of the three structures (with different relative densities) in two orthogonal loading directions (directions 1 and 2)

Key resultsSample with relative density of 0.5Sample with relative density of 0.34Sample with relative density of 0.29
Load Direction 1Load Direction 2Load Direction 1Load Direction 1Load Direction 2
Peak force (kN)0.390.330.640.390.33
Force–displacement curve-Higher stiffness -Brittle behaviour-Lower stiffness -Ductile behaviour-Structure is symmetric in all loading directions-Higher stiffness -Abrupt fracture after peak force-Lower stiffness -Gradual fracture after peak force
Deformation-Non-uniform deformation -The central hole loses its original shape -Vertical strut buckles-Uniform deformation -The structure folds up consistently -Central hole remains stable-Stable and uniform deformation -The central hole closes like a “human eye”-Non-uniform deformation -Buckling of the vertical strut -Central hole collapses-Uniform deformation -The outer wall touches the walls of the central hole -Central hole closes
Damage-Maximum stresses occur along the strut -Fracture of the walls of the central hole-Maximum stresses at the four corners of the structure -There is generally a uniform stress distribution on the walls of the structure-Maximum stresses along the vertical strut -The rest of the structure exhibits uniform stress distribution-Stress is highly concentrated along the vertical strut and corners of the structure -The central hole fractures and collapses- The maximum stresses occur at the corners of the outer walls -Fracture occurs at the outer walls of the structure
Source(s): Table by authors

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal