Table 4

Regression results of trust alternatives on information transparency

VariablesDEVIATION1DEVIATION2DEVIATION3DEVIATION4DEVIATION1DEVIATION2DEVIATION3DEVIATION4
TRUSTWC−0.074***−0.066***−0.024***−0.089***    
(0.015)(0.016)(0.005)(0.030)    
TRUSTTF    −0.013***−0.010***−0.004***−0.019***
    (0.002)(0.002)(0.001)(0.005)
C and CONTROLESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES
YEAR_FEYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES
IND_FEYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES
Obs1,9761,9761,9761,9761,9761,9761,9761,976
R20.5860.4950.4810.4520.5880.4950.4820.454
Adj R20.5750.4800.4670.4360.5770.4800.4680.439
F50.28***34.72***32.92***29.24***50.65***34.71***33.04***29.51***

Note(s): This table explores the effects of alternative trust measures (TRUSTWC, TRUSTTF) on information transparency. The regression results are presented in a similar format to Table 3, with additional models comparing different trust metrics. This table helps in understanding whether alternative trust metrics behave similarly or provide distinct insights into the role of trust language. Standard errors in parentheses. All variables are defined in Appendix A. *p < 0.10, **p < 0.05, and ***p < 0.01

Source(s): Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal