Table 8

Consistent Predictors of Civic Engagement Outcomes

Environmental ConservationCommunity ServiceIntention to VotePolitical DiscussionWillingness to Contact OfficialaPersonal Efficacy
Background Characteristics      
Female (vs. male)negativePOSITIVEPOSITIVEnegative POSITIVE
Ethnicity (vs. White)      
African AmericannegativenegativePOSITIVE  POSITIVE
LatinoPOSITIVE negative   
Other ethnicity  negative   
Grade in school POSITIVE POSITIVE  
Free/reduced-price lunch negativenegativenegative  
Adults in family (vs. two)      
One      
Three or more      
School-Related Factors      
Positive characterPOSITIVEPOSITIVEPOSITIVE  POSITIVE
Conflict resolution skillPOSITIVEPOSITIVEPOSITIVEPOSITIVE POSITIVE
Academic grades POSITIVEPOSITIVE   
School discussion climatenegativenegativePOSITIVEPOSITIVE POSITIVE
School engagementPOSITIVE negativePOSITIVE POSITIVE
School belonging POSITIVEPOSITIVE  POSITIVE
School support     POSITIVE
Personal safety  POSITIVE negative 
Extracurricular Activities      
Sport activities POSITIVEPOSITIVEnegative  
Nonsport activities POSITIVE POSITIVEPOSITIVEPOSITIVE
Civic Outcomes      
EnvironmentalnaPOSITIVEnegativePOSITIVEPOSITIVEPOSITIVE
conservation      
Community servicePOSITIVEnaPOSITIVEPOSITIVEPOSITIVEPOSITIVE
Intention to votenegativePOSITIVEnaPOSITIVEPOSITIVEPOSITIVE
Political discussionPOSITIVEPOSITIVEPOSITIVEnaPOSITIVEPOSITIVE
Willingness to contactPOSITIVEPOSITIVEPOSITIVEPOSITIVEna 
official      
Personal efficacyPOSITIVEPOSITIVEPOSITIVEPOSITIVE na

Note: Consistent predictors are significant (p < .05) in the same direction (POSITIVE/negative) in 2008 and 2009.

aThe 2008 version of this item read “contacted” rather than “would contact” a public official.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal