Table 4

Panel regression results

POLSFERE
CONAGR0.1186***−0.0940**−0.0072
(0.000)(0.031)(0.849)
CONINDS0.0356*0.01160.0172
(0.098)(0.744)(0.550)
CONSERV0.0420*0.1402***0.0747**
(0.075)(0.000)(0.015)
RDEVEXP0.0789***0.0800***0.0916***
(0.000)(0.000)(0.000)
CTDS−0.0865***−0.0898***−0.0875***
(0.000)(0.000)(0.000)
GSTDum1.9887***1.5762***1.6839***
(0.000)(0.000)(0.000)
C5.7289***4.76716.1386**
(0.002)(0.101)(0.012)
Tests
Chow TestH0: POLS is more consistent than FE241.21FE is more consistent
(0.000)
BPLM TestH0: POLS is more consistent than RE249.16RE is more consistent
(0.000)
Hausman TestH0: RE is more consistent than FE31.04FE is more consistent
(0.000)
Diagnostic tests
Modified Wald test for HeteroskedasticityH0: No heteroskedasticity (constant variance)405.97Heteroskedasticity
(0.000)
Wooldridge test for AutocorrelationH0: No first-order autocorrelation65.865Autocorrelation
(0.000)

Note(s): p-value in parentheses and the asterisks (***), (**) and * stands for 1%, 5% and 10% level of significance respectively

Source(s): Author

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal