Evidence-to-construct mapping (Table 1 factors against empirical evidence)
| TOE sub-factor (from Table 1) | Empirical status | Citizen-facing AI | Internal administrative AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Relative advantage | Corroborated; category-specific | Capacity reallocation (≈60% automated enquiries) | Amplification of expert judgement (€898.7 M detected, 82% hit rate) |
| Compatibility | Corroborated; tighter for internal | Moderate (interfaces decoupled) | High (on-premise legacy; 150-yr data) |
| Complexity | Partially observed; resurfaces as explainability | Low observed | Explainability burden (15% residual, human-in-the-loop) |
| Top-management support | Corroborated | Directive No. 8/2024 assigns deliverables | Directive No. 8/2024 assigns deliverables |
| Culture/absorptive capacity | Corroborated and refined | IT–policy integration | IT–policy integration |
| Resources | Corroborated | Human-capital scarcity → reallocation | Data resources (150-yr DB) |
| Structure | Corroborated with qualification | Centralised propagation of Directive | Centralised propagation of Directive |
| Regulatory framework | Corroborated | Stronger explainability salience (GDPR) | Stronger (EU AI Act high-risk for rights) |
| Stakeholder pressures | Corroborated and differentiated | Citizen trust/legitimacy dominant | Trade-union/employee-council dominant |
| External support | Partially corroborated | Secondary to constitutional perimeter | Secondary to constitutional perimeter |
| Demographic/fiscal pressures | Corroborated and refined | Aggregate driver | Aggregate driver |
| TOE sub-factor (from | Empirical status | Citizen-facing AI | Internal administrative AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Relative advantage | Corroborated; category-specific | Capacity reallocation (≈60% automated enquiries) | Amplification of expert judgement (€898.7 M detected, 82% hit rate) |
| Compatibility | Corroborated; tighter for internal | Moderate (interfaces decoupled) | High (on-premise legacy; 150-yr data) |
| Complexity | Partially observed; resurfaces as explainability | Low observed | Explainability burden (15% residual, human-in-the-loop) |
| Top-management support | Corroborated | Directive No. 8/2024 assigns deliverables | Directive No. 8/2024 assigns deliverables |
| Culture/absorptive capacity | Corroborated and refined | IT–policy integration | IT–policy integration |
| Resources | Corroborated | Human-capital scarcity → reallocation | Data resources (150-yr DB) |
| Structure | Corroborated with qualification | Centralised propagation of Directive | Centralised propagation of Directive |
| Regulatory framework | Corroborated | Stronger explainability salience (GDPR) | Stronger (EU AI Act high-risk for rights) |
| Stakeholder pressures | Corroborated and differentiated | Citizen trust/legitimacy dominant | Trade-union/employee-council dominant |
| External support | Partially corroborated | Secondary to constitutional perimeter | Secondary to constitutional perimeter |
| Demographic/fiscal pressures | Corroborated and refined | Aggregate driver | Aggregate driver |
Note(s): DB: Database
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.