Table 2 Testing for indirect effects...

Table 2

Testing for indirect effects

Hypothesis	Relationship	β	SE	t–value	95% BCI		Type of mediation
Hypothesis	Relationship	β	SE	t–value	2.5 (%)	97.5 (%)	Type of mediation
	Mediating effects on individual performances – model 1
	KM → ContPerf^a	0.347	0.044	7.857***
H3(a)	KM → INOV → ContPerf^b	0.177	0.033	3.543***	0.056	0.184	Complementary partial mediation
H5(a)	KM → Motivation → ContPerf^b	0.098	0.028	3.480**	0.043	0.153	Complementary partial mediation
	KM → ContPerf^c	0.215	0.032	6.650***	0.153	0.280
	KM → TaskPerf^a	0.392	0.041	9.518***
H3(b)	KM → INOV → TaskPerf^b	0.063	0.031	2.022*	0.005	0.127	Complementary partial mediation
H5(b)	KM → Motivation → TaskPerf^b	0.094	0.029	3.232**	0.037	0.149	Complementary partial mediation
	KM → TaskPerf^c	0.156	0.030	5.174***	0.097	0.215
	Mediating effects on organizational performance – model 2
	KM → FinPerf^a	0.042	0.042	1.013
H4(a)	KM → INOV → FinPerf^b	0.259	0.031	8.247***	0.199	0.322	Full mediation
H6(a)	KM → Motivation → FinPerf^b	0.234	0.026	9.147***	0.185	0.286	Full mediation
	KM → FinPerf^c	0.494	0.033	14.786***	0.425	0.556
	KM → PercPerf^a	0.082	0.038	2.123*
H4(b)	KM → INOV → PercPerf^b	0.156	0.030	5.208***	0.099	0.218	Complementary partial mediation
H6(b)	KM → Motivation → PercPerf^b	0.289	0.027	10.816***	0.235	0.341	Complementary partial mediation
	KM → PercPerf^c	0.445	0.032	14.132***	0.382	0.506
	KM → ProdServPerf^a	0.073	0.040	1.823
H4(c)	KM → INOV → ProdServPerf^b	0.227	0.030	7.484***	0.167	0.287	Full mediation
H6(c)	KM → Motivation → ProdServPerf^b	0.238	0.026	9.255***	0.190	0.289	Full mediation
	KM → ProdServPerf^c	0.465	0.031	14.800***	0.402	0.527

Hypothesis	Relationship	β	SE	t–value	95% BCI		Type of mediation
Hypothesis	Relationship	β	SE	t–value	2.5 (%)	97.5 (%)	Type of mediation
	Mediating effects on individual performances – model 1
	KM → ContPerf^a	0.347	0.044	7.857***
H3(a)	KM → INOV → ContPerf^b	0.177	0.033	3.543***	0.056	0.184	Complementary partial mediation
H5(a)	KM → Motivation → ContPerf^b	0.098	0.028	3.480**	0.043	0.153	Complementary partial mediation
	KM → ContPerf^c	0.215	0.032	6.650***	0.153	0.280
	KM → TaskPerf^a	0.392	0.041	9.518***
H3(b)	KM → INOV → TaskPerf^b	0.063	0.031	2.022*	0.005	0.127	Complementary partial mediation
H5(b)	KM → Motivation → TaskPerf^b	0.094	0.029	3.232**	0.037	0.149	Complementary partial mediation
	KM → TaskPerf^c	0.156	0.030	5.174***	0.097	0.215
	Mediating effects on organizational performance – model 2
	KM → FinPerf^a	0.042	0.042	1.013
H4(a)	KM → INOV → FinPerf^b	0.259	0.031	8.247***	0.199	0.322	Full mediation
H6(a)	KM → Motivation → FinPerf^b	0.234	0.026	9.147***	0.185	0.286	Full mediation
	KM → FinPerf^c	0.494	0.033	14.786***	0.425	0.556
	KM → PercPerf^a	0.082	0.038	2.123*
H4(b)	KM → INOV → PercPerf^b	0.156	0.030	5.208***	0.099	0.218	Complementary partial mediation
H6(b)	KM → Motivation → PercPerf^b	0.289	0.027	10.816***	0.235	0.341	Complementary partial mediation
	KM → PercPerf^c	0.445	0.032	14.132***	0.382	0.506
	KM → ProdServPerf^a	0.073	0.040	1.823
H4(c)	KM → INOV → ProdServPerf^b	0.227	0.030	7.484***	0.167	0.287	Full mediation
H6(c)	KM → Motivation → ProdServPerf^b	0.238	0.026	9.255***	0.190	0.289	Full mediation
	KM → ProdServPerf^c	0.465	0.031	14.800***	0.402	0.527

Note(s): ^aDirect effect; ^bPartial indirect effect; ^cTotal indirect effect; β – Standardized path coefficient; SE – Standard error; t – t-test value; BCI – bias corrected confidence intervals; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001

Source(s): Computation of the authors with SmartPls (v3.3.3) (Ringle et al., 2015), based on the survey results

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable