Previous literature reviews on corporate biodiversity accounting
| Article | Theoretical framework | Focus | Method | Stakeholder engagement | Future research |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blanco-Zaitegi et al. (2022). Biodiversity accounting and reporting: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis | No theoretical framework | Mapping the intellectual structure of biodiversity accounting and management | Systematic literature review, bibliometric analysis, thematic clusters of biodiversity accounting and reporting | Highlighting the importance of stakeholder engagement regarding local biodiversity knowledge and the auditing of biodiversity information | Calling for research on the integration of stakeholder engagement in CBM |
| Maione et al. (2023). An algorithmic historiography of biodiversity accounting literature | No theoretical framework | Exploring historical and contemporary trends in biodiversity accounting | Algorithmic historiography | No focus on stakeholder engagement | Emphasizing interdisciplinary collaboration, the integration of social costs in accounting, the creation of incentives, institutional frameworks, and measurement tools, and stakeholder engagement |
| Maione et al. (2024). Biodiversity accounting: a bibliometric analysis for comprehensive literature mapping | No theoretical framework | Mapping research trends in biodiversity accounting | Bibliometric analysis, descriptive analysis, thematic clusters | No focus on stakeholder engagement | Emphasizing the development of measurement tools and reporting frameworks that include social aspects, and the promotion of interdisciplinary collaboration |
| Roberts et al. (2021). Biodiversity and extinction accounting for sustainable development: A systematic literature review and future research direction | No theoretical framework, but the findings show that legitimacy theory is the most commonly applied theoretical framework in the literature | Reviewing biodiversity and species extinction accounting literature | Systematic literature review | Emphasizing the importance of the corporate’s collaboration with NGOs and the public sector for species preservation | Calling for future research that moves beyond traditional CSR theories and incorporates theoretical frameworks from broader social sciences |
| Schaltegger et al. (2023). Managing and accounting for corporate biodiversity contributions. Mapping the field | No theoretical framework | Examining barriers to CBM and the importance of accounting for integrating biodiversity in corporate strategies | Literature review | No focus on stakeholder engagement | Highlighting the need to further explore management accounting to improve the consideration of biodiversity impacts in decision-making |
| Article | Theoretical framework | Focus | Method | Stakeholder engagement | Future research |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No theoretical framework | Mapping the intellectual structure of biodiversity accounting and management | Systematic literature review, bibliometric analysis, thematic clusters of biodiversity accounting and reporting | Highlighting the importance of stakeholder engagement regarding local biodiversity knowledge and the auditing of biodiversity information | Calling for research on the integration of stakeholder engagement in CBM | |
| No theoretical framework | Exploring historical and contemporary trends in biodiversity accounting | Algorithmic historiography | No focus on stakeholder engagement | Emphasizing interdisciplinary collaboration, the integration of social costs in accounting, the creation of incentives, institutional frameworks, and measurement tools, and stakeholder engagement | |
| No theoretical framework | Mapping research trends in biodiversity accounting | Bibliometric analysis, descriptive analysis, thematic clusters | No focus on stakeholder engagement | Emphasizing the development of measurement tools and reporting frameworks that include social aspects, and the promotion of interdisciplinary collaboration | |
| No theoretical framework, but the findings show that legitimacy theory is the most commonly applied theoretical framework in the literature | Reviewing biodiversity and species extinction accounting literature | Systematic literature review | Emphasizing the importance of the corporate’s collaboration with NGOs and the public sector for species preservation | Calling for future research that moves beyond traditional CSR theories and incorporates theoretical frameworks from broader social sciences | |
| No theoretical framework | Examining barriers to CBM and the importance of accounting for integrating biodiversity in corporate strategies | Literature review | No focus on stakeholder engagement | Highlighting the need to further explore management accounting to improve the consideration of biodiversity impacts in decision-making |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.