Table 2. Correlations and... | Emerald Publishing

Table 2.

Correlations and Fornell–Larcker criterion for validity assessment

Construct	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12
1. Organizational unlearning	0.76
2. MMI	0.48**	–
3. Product rollover performance	0.42**	0.67**	0.76
4. Environmental dynamism	0.49**	0.44**	0.35**	0.80
5. Firm size (small)	−0.01	−0.18*	−0.13	0.04	–
6. Firm size (medium)	0.08	0.11	−0.06	0.06	−0.36**	–
7. Product rollover regularity	−0.10	−0.03	−0.04	−0.29**	0.08	−0.19*	–
8. Product homogeneity	0.08	0.14	0.13	0.27*	−0.15	0.06	−0.13	0.81
9. Industrial goods	−0.12	−0.17*	−0.10	−0.13	−0.01	0.02	0.05	−0.31	–
10. Consumer discretionary	0.02	0.03	0.04	0.05	0.01	−0.05	0.01	0.14	−0.21**	–
11. Health care	−0.03	−0.03	−0.02	−0.10	−0.01	−0.05	0.07	−0.05	−0.19*	−0.19*	–
12. Information technology	0.02	−0.01	−0.04	0.09	−0.05	−0.06	−0.04	−0.03	−0.30**	−0.31**	−0.28**	–

Construct	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12
1. Organizational unlearning	0.76
2. MMI	0.48**	–
3. Product rollover performance	0.42**	0.67**	0.76
4. Environmental dynamism	0.49**	0.44**	0.35**	0.80
5. Firm size (small)	−0.01	−0.18*	−0.13	0.04	–
6. Firm size (medium)	0.08	0.11	−0.06	0.06	−0.36**	–
7. Product rollover regularity	−0.10	−0.03	−0.04	−0.29**	0.08	−0.19*	–
8. Product homogeneity	0.08	0.14	0.13	0.27*	−0.15	0.06	−0.13	0.81
9. Industrial goods	−0.12	−0.17*	−0.10	−0.13	−0.01	0.02	0.05	−0.31	–
10. Consumer discretionary	0.02	0.03	0.04	0.05	0.01	−0.05	0.01	0.14	−0.21**	–
11. Health care	−0.03	−0.03	−0.02	−0.10	−0.01	−0.05	0.07	−0.05	−0.19*	−0.19*	–
12. Information technology	0.02	−0.01	−0.04	0.09	−0.05	−0.06	−0.04	−0.03	−0.30**	−0.31**	−0.28**	–

Note(s):

The diagonal elements (in italics) are the square roots of the AVE values. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01

Source(s): Authors’ own work