Table 3

Descriptive Statistics, Results From Follow-Up ANOVAs, and Post Hoc Comparisons for Each Empathy Scale for Students With Higher and Lower Baseline Empathy

TimeTime Main Effect (FStatistic)Effect Size (ηp2)Post Hoc Comparisons
Pre (1) Mean (SD)Imm. Post (2) Mean (SD)Del. Post (3) Mean (SD)(1) to (2)(2) to (3)(1) to (3)
Lower baseline empathy (n = 59)PT2.94 (0.47)03.16 (0.50)3.12 (0.42)7.45**0.110.21**-0.040.18**
F2.76 (0.58)2.98 (0.69)3.06 (0.70)13.86***0.190.22**0.090.30***
EC3.26 (0.56)3.49 (0.58)3.29 (0.45)7.54**0.120.22**-0.19**0.03
OES2.99 (0.27)3.21 (0.39)3.16 (0.34)16.29***0.190.22***-0.050.17***
Higher baseline empathy (n = 62)PT3.74 (0.54)3.84 (0.61)3.59 (0.62)7.08**0.100.10-0.25**-0.15^
F3.78 (0.61)3.94 (0.69)3.72 (0.65)4.87^0.070.16^-0.21*-0.06
EC4.03 (0.47)4.04 (0.56)3.80 (0.60)9.48***0.140.02-0.23**-0.25***
OES3.85 (0.34)3.94 (0.43)3.71 (0.45)14.11***0.220.09-0.23***-0.14**

Note: PT = perspective-taking; F = fantasy; EC = Empathic concern; OES = overall empathy score, or mean of PT, F, and EC scales.

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options