Performance comparison of anomaly detection models under single sensor conditions
| Methods | Results of the comparison of the two datasets | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video data | Vibration data | |||||||
| Accuracy | Precision | Recall | F1 | Accuracy | Precision | Recall | F1 | |
| LiConvFormer | 75.16% | 76.95% | 75.17% | 75.50% | 77.64% | 77.01% | 77.56% | 76.82% |
| TCN | 80.12% | 81.09% | 80.09% | 79.80% | 82.61% | 85.29% | 82.53% | 81.68% |
| CNN | 75.16% | 76.28% | 75.06% | 75.16% | 81.99% | 81.83% | 81.91% | 81.76& |
| BiLSTM | 80.75% | 81.65% | 80.70% | 81.02% | 92.55% | 92.69% | 92.50% | 92.44& |
| GCN | 85.09% | 85.81% | 85.06% | 85.09% | 70.19% | 70.12% | 70.17% | 70.08& |
| TSGCN | 87.58% | 87.97% | 87.55% | 87.53% | 95.03% | 94.99% | 95.00% | 94.97% |
| Methods | Results of the comparison of the two datasets | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video data | Vibration data | |||||||
| Accuracy | Precision | Recall | F1 | Accuracy | Precision | Recall | F1 | |
| LiConvFormer | 75.16% | 76.95% | 75.17% | 75.50% | 77.64% | 77.01% | 77.56% | 76.82% |
| TCN | 80.12% | 81.09% | 80.09% | 79.80% | 82.61% | 85.29% | 82.53% | 81.68% |
| CNN | 75.16% | 76.28% | 75.06% | 75.16% | 81.99% | 81.83% | 81.91% | 81.76& |
| BiLSTM | 80.75% | 81.65% | 80.70% | 81.02% | 92.55% | 92.69% | 92.50% | 92.44& |
| GCN | 85.09% | 85.81% | 85.06% | 85.09% | 70.19% | 70.12% | 70.17% | 70.08& |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.