Quality appraisal criteria, adapted from QuADS
| Criteria | Operationalization |
|---|---|
| Reflexivity | Stated philosophical stance (interpretivist, realist, etc.) Identification of position or approach taken to the topic (critical, normative, etc.) |
| Phenomenon | Research questions or objectives are clearly identified |
| Methodology | Methodological approach is specified (qualitative case studies, literature review, quantitative, etc.) |
| Ontological–methodology fit | Fit between reflexive statement and methodological approach |
| Research question–methodology fit | Statement of how the methodology fits the research question |
| Method–methodology fit | Justification of fit is offered that explicitly says why the approach is best, not just that it is |
| Validity control | Procedure for internal validity and bias reduction addresses external validity |
| Criteria | Operationalization |
|---|---|
| Reflexivity | Stated philosophical stance (interpretivist, realist, etc.) Identification of position or approach taken to the topic (critical, normative, etc.) |
| Phenomenon | Research questions or objectives are clearly identified |
| Methodology | Methodological approach is specified (qualitative case studies, literature review, quantitative, etc.) |
| Ontological–methodology fit | Fit between reflexive statement and methodological approach |
| Research question–methodology fit | Statement of how the methodology fits the research question |
| Method–methodology fit | Justification of fit is offered that explicitly says why the approach is best, not just that it is |
| Validity control | Procedure for internal validity and bias reduction addresses external validity |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.