Table 3

Top 10 most relevant articles in aviation

SourceObjectivesAI modelsMaintenance aspectShort outcomes
Tseremoglou et al. (2023) To optimize maintenance schedules by predicting the remaining useful life of componentsDRL and MILPMaintenance schedulingThe proposed MILP model produces more stable maintenance schedules and reduces maintenance ground time compared to other methods
Vos et al. (2023) Maximize fleet availability while minimizing maintenance costsRLMaintenance schedulingDemonstrated that RL-based policy can improve overall fleet availability, though the large action space in scheduling poses computational challenges
Ribeiro et al. (2022) To develop interactive tools that enable human planners to design and visualize condition-based maintenance plans using ML supportML integrated with a RL agentMaintenance planning (condition-based maintenance)Introduced a novel human–computer interaction approach that helps maintenance planners interact with an ML agent, leading to more reliable maintenance plans and better user understanding of AI-driven recommendations
Lee and Mitici (2023) Leverage DRL and RUL prognostics for proactive aircraft maintenance decision-makingDRL combined with probabilistic RUL estimationPredictive maintenance schedulingShowed that a DRL approach can optimize maintenance timing by using RUL predictions, thereby reducing unscheduled downtime and improving maintenance efficiency
Tseremoglou and Santos (2024) To schedule aircraft maintenance under uncertaintyDRLMaintenance scheduling (condition-based maintenance)Demonstrated that a deep RL algorithm can handle uncertain system information and still improve maintenance scheduling decisions, achieving higher availability under partial observability conditions
Dangut et al. (2022) Improve fault prediction in aircraft systems by addressing class imbalance in maintenance dataBACHE algorithm with ML classifiersPredictive maintenanceThe proposed approach improved fault detection accuracy by balancing rare failure cases in the dataset, leading to more reliable identification of infrequent but critical failures
Kabashkin and Susanin (2024) Support decisions on repair or replacement of aircraft components throughout their life cycleDecision-support model (ML-based prognostics)Maintenance planningProvided a model that optimizes component maintenance and replacement timing over its life cycle, resulting in improved long-term fleet reliability and cost savings
Zhou et al. (2022) Predict spare parts demands and plan component replacements by identifying competing failure risks in fleet equipmentHybrid learning algorithm (statistical reliability models with ML)Maintenance planning and spare parts managementImproves prediction of component failures and corresponding spare part needs, enabling efficient component replacement strategies and reduced downtime across the fleet
Rahim et al. (2020) To minimize the life-cycle maintenance costs for critical aircraft components through optimized planningAI-assisted optimization modelMaintenance planningDeveloped a maintenance planning strategy that reduces overall costs for critical components by optimizing inspection and replacement intervals without compromising safety
Dang et al. (2024) To enhance the transparency of AI-driven maintenance scheduling decisions using explainable AI techniquesExplainable AI integrated with maintenance scheduling algorithmsMaintenance scheduling (condition-based maintenance)Demonstrated that providing causal explanations for AI-recommended maintenance schedules increases user trust and understanding, while still achieving efficient scheduling of aircraft maintenance

Note(s): DRL: Deep reinforcement learning; MILP: mixed-integer linear programming; RL: reinforcement learning; ML: machine learning; RUL: remaining useful life; DSM: decision-support model; AI: artificial intelligence; CBM: condition-based maintenance; SVM: support vector machine

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal