The Interaction Analysis Model and Scale
| Description | Phase | Scale Score |
|---|---|---|
| Level 1: Sharing and comparing of information | ||
| A statement of observation or opinion | la. | 1.1 |
| A statement of agreement from one or more other participants | lb. | 1.3 |
| Corroborating examples provided by one or more participants | 1c. | 1.5 |
| Asking and answering questions to clarify details of statements | 1d. | 1.7 |
| Definition, description, or identification of a problem | 1e. | 1.9 |
| Level 2: Discovery and exploration of dissonance or inconsistency | ||
| Identifying and stating areas of disagreement | 2a. | 2.2 |
| Asking and answering questions to clarify the source and extent of disagreement | 2b. | 2.5 |
| Restating the participant’s position, and possibly advancing arguments or considerations in its support by references to the participant’s experience, literature, formal data collected, or proposal of relevant metaphor or analogy to illustrate point of view | 2c. | 2.8 |
| Level 3: Negotiation of meaning/co-construction of knowledge | ||
| Negotiation or clarification of the meaning of terms | 3a. | 3.1 |
| Negotiation of the relative weight to be assigned to types of argument | 3b. | 3.3 |
| Identification of areas of agreement or overlap among conflicting concepts | 3c. | 3.5 |
| Proposal and negotiation of new statements embodying compromise and co-construction | 3d. | 3.7 |
| Proposal of integrating or accommodating metaphors or analogies | 3e. | 3.9 |
| Level 4: Testing and modification of proposed synthesis or co-construction | ||
| Testing the proposed synthesis against “received fact” as shared by the participants and/or their culture | 4a. | 4.1 |
| Testing against existing cognitive schema | 4b. | 4.3 |
| Testing against personal experience | 4c. | 4.5 |
| Testing against formal data collected | 4d. | 4.7 |
| Testing against contradictory testimony in the literature | 4e. | 4.9 |
| Level 5: Agreement statements/applications of newly constructed meaning | ||
| Summarization of agreement(s) | 5a. | 5.2 |
| Applications of new knowledge | 5b. | 5.5 |
| Metacognitive statements by the participants illustrating their understanding that their knowledge or ways of thinking (cognitive schema) have changed as a result of the interaction | 5c. | 5.8 |
| A statement of observation or opinion | la. | 1.1 |
| A statement of agreement from one or more other participants | lb. | 1.3 |
| Corroborating examples provided by one or more participants | 1c. | 1.5 |
| Asking and answering questions to clarify details of statements | 1d. | 1.7 |
| Definition, description, or identification of a problem | 1e. | 1.9 |
| Identifying and stating areas of disagreement | 2a. | 2.2 |
| Asking and answering questions to clarify the source and extent of disagreement | 2b. | 2.5 |
| Restating the participant’s position, and possibly advancing arguments or considerations in its support by references to the participant’s experience, literature, formal data collected, or proposal of relevant metaphor or analogy to illustrate point of view | 2c. | 2.8 |
| Negotiation or clarification of the meaning of terms | 3a. | 3.1 |
| Negotiation of the relative weight to be assigned to types of argument | 3b. | 3.3 |
| Identification of areas of agreement or overlap among conflicting concepts | 3c. | 3.5 |
| Proposal and negotiation of new statements embodying compromise and co-construction | 3d. | 3.7 |
| Proposal of integrating or accommodating metaphors or analogies | 3e. | 3.9 |
| Testing the proposed synthesis against “received fact” as shared by the participants and/or their culture | 4a. | 4.1 |
| Testing against existing cognitive schema | 4b. | 4.3 |
| Testing against personal experience | 4c. | 4.5 |
| Testing against formal data collected | 4d. | 4.7 |
| Testing against contradictory testimony in the literature | 4e. | 4.9 |
| Summarization of agreement(s) | 5a. | 5.2 |
| Applications of new knowledge | 5b. | 5.5 |
| Metacognitive statements by the participants illustrating their understanding that their knowledge or ways of thinking (cognitive schema) have changed as a result of the interaction | 5c. | 5.8 |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.