Table 2 Configurations leading to high...

Table 2

Configurations leading to high vs. low levels of internationalization intensity

	Higher FSTS			Lower FSTS
	1	2	3	1	2	3	4
Perceived International Risk	•			•			•
Perceived International Uncertainty	•			•		•	•
Willingness to adopt I4.0 technologies	•	•		⊗	⊗
Network Exploration		•	•		⊗	•
Network Exploitation	⊗	⊗	•		•	•
Analytic-Based System C		•	•	•	⊗	⊗	•
Experience-Based System X	•	⊗	•	⊗	•		•
Consistency	0.895	0.837	0.818	0.876	0.839	0.830	0.848
Unique coverage	0.078	0.062	0.057	0.072	0.031	0.024	0.053
Raw coverage	0.415	0.393	0.387	0.426	0.358	0.314	0.295
Overall solution consistency	0.829			0.887
Overall solution coverage	0.608			0.667
Overlapping coverage	0.411			0.487

	Higher FSTS			Lower FSTS
	1	2	3	1	2	3	4
Perceived International Risk	•			•			•
Perceived International Uncertainty	•			•		•	•
Willingness to adopt I4.0 technologies	•	•		⊗	⊗
Network Exploration		•	•		⊗	•
Network Exploitation	⊗	⊗	•		•	•
Analytic-Based System C		•	•	•	⊗	⊗	•
Experience-Based System X	•	⊗	•	⊗	•		•
Consistency	0.895	0.837	0.818	0.876	0.839	0.830	0.848
Unique coverage	0.078	0.062	0.057	0.072	0.031	0.024	0.053
Raw coverage	0.415	0.393	0.387	0.426	0.358	0.314	0.295
Overall solution consistency	0.829			0.887
Overall solution coverage	0.608			0.667
Overlapping coverage	0.411			0.487

Note(s): Black circles (•) indicate the presence of a condition; circles with “x” (⊗) indicate its absence; Blank space; “don't care” condition. The overlapping coverage score is obtained by subtracting the sum of each path's unique coverage from the solution coverage. “Raw” reflects the extent to which that set of reasons (i.e. the path) explains the outcome (when the “Raw” value is higher, those reasons factored in more heavily)

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable