Table 6

ANOVA results for study 2

Trust(M)Corporate credibility - expertiseAttitude towards the firmPurchase intention (S)
Mean(SD)Mean(SD)Mean(SD)Mean(SD)
Study 2 – Positive responses
1–BankN = 285.3(1.4)5.6(1.1)5.7(1.2)5.2(1.6)
2–Sugar millN = 315.6(0.9)5.5(0.8)5.9(0.9)5.9(0.9)
3–Fuel distributorN = 295.5(1.1)5.5(1.1)5.8(1.2)5.8(1.3)
4–Truck manufacturerN = 305.9(0.9)5.9(0.9)6.1(0.9)5.6(1.2)
Statisticsp-value1.970.2930.5970.144
 F(114; 3)1.5861.2550.6311.839
 Partial η20.0400.0320.0160.046
Study 2 – Negative responses
1–BankN = 275.0(1.2)[2][3]5.5(1.2)[2]5.1(1.5)[2][3]4.6(1.6)[2]
2–Sugar millN = 283.4(1.7)[1]4.3(1.2)[1]3.3(1.7)[1]3.6(1.6)[1]
3–Fuel distributorN = 263.6(1.5)[1]4.7(1.1)3.8(1.8)[1]4.1(1.9)
4–Truck manufacturerN = 254.3(1.8)5.1(1.6)4.3(1.9)4.1(2.2)
Statisticsp-value<0.001***0.012**0.003***0.230
 F(102; 3)6.3163.8345.0271.460
 Partial η20.1570.1010.1290.041
Post-hoc tests
[1][2]Bank vs Sugar millMean difference1.6−1.21.71.0
 p-value<0.001***0.009***0.002***0.086*
[1][3]Bank vs Fuel distributorMean difference1.5 1.3 
p-value0.001*** 0.040** 
p-value    

Note(s): *p < 0.10, **p < 0.05, ***p < 0.01. Numbers in parentheses are sample standard deviations. Numbers in brackets indicate the significant post-hoc differences, according to Tukey's or Games–Howell pairwise comparison test

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal